The compact hatchback segment boasts a variety of contenders, with the Suzuki Swift and VW Polo leading the charge. Both cars offer a mix of style, efficiency, and performance, making them unique options for urban driving and beyond. Let's dive into their technical specs and innovations to see how these two popular models stack up against each other.
The 2024 Suzuki Swift is equipped with a mild hybrid petrol engine, generating 82 HP and a maximum torque of 112 Nm from its 1.2-liter three-cylinder engine. With both manual and CVT transmission options available, it promises a nimble and spirited drive. Front-wheel and all-wheel drive options add versatility for different driving conditions.
In contrast, the VW Polo ranges from 80 HP to a sporty 207 HP, offering a broader spectrum for performance enthusiasts. Its engine variations include both three and four-cylinder configurations, with a quick-shifting dual-clutch automatic available for a more dynamic driving experience. The Polo's top-of-the-line model rockets from 0-100 km/h in just 6.5 seconds, showcasing its performance prowess.
The Swift boasts an impressive fuel consumption between 4.4 and 4.9 L/100km, translating to commendable efficiency for city commuters. The mild hybrid system aids in achieving a low CO2 emission range of 98-106 g/km, earning it a CO2 efficiency class rating of 'C'.
The Polo, though slightly less efficient, offers a range of 5.2 to 6.5 L/100km. It takes a hit in CO2 emissions with figures from 118 to 149 g/km, resulting in a 'D' or 'E' efficiency class. Nevertheless, the broader power range of the Polo caters to varied preferences, especially for those seeking more performance.
Both hatchbacks comfortably seat five passengers and offer practical everyday usability. The Swift's trunk offers 265 liters of cargo space, suitable for daily errands. Its dimensions (3860 mm in length, 1735 mm in width, and up to 1510 mm in height) allow nimble maneuvering in tight urban environments.
The Polo provides a slightly more generous trunk capacity of 351 liters, and its larger body dimensions (4074 mm in length and 1751 mm in width) contribute to a more spacious cabin feel. While both cars are designed with a focus on comfort, the Polo's additional bells and whistles can appeal to those desiring a bit more luxury in their drives.
Suzuki's Swift has embraced hybrid technology to offer an eco-friendly option, with its mild hybrid system enhancing efficiency without compromising on performance. It provides a balanced drive suitable for a variety of conditions, from city commutes to country drives.
VW's Polo stands out with its advanced transmission offerings, particularly the dual-clutch automatic gearbox, which is rare in this vehicle segment. Additionally, it includes a broad selection of engine options, allowing buyers to tailor their purchase to their specific needs—whether it's city efficiency or performance excitement.
Choosing between the Suzuki Swift and VW Polo depends greatly on what a driver values more. For those prioritizing efficiency and simplicity, the Swift with its hybrid tech and compact form is an enticing pick. Meanwhile, the Polo appeals to those looking for a bit more power and space, alongside the prestige of the VW badge.
In assessing both these charismatic hatchbacks, it remains clear that while they embody different characteristics, they each hold their own in the vibrant tapestry of compact cars, delivering appeal to a broad audience of drivers.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
VW Polo has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 17000 £, while the Suzuki Swift costs 17100 £. That’s a price difference of around 141 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki Swift manages with 4.40 L and is therefore somewhat more efficient than the VW Polo with 5.10 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the VW Polo has a significantly edge – offering 207 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 125 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the VW Polo performs distinct better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Suzuki Swift tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 70 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: VW Polo pulls convincingly stronger with 320 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 208 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Suzuki Swift is minimal lighter – 1069 kg compared to 1143 kg. The difference is around 74 kg.
In terms of boot space, the VW Polo offers noticeable more room – 351 L compared to 265 L. That’s a difference of about 86 L.
In maximum load capacity, the VW Polo performs to a small extent better – up to 1125 L, which is about 145 L more than the Suzuki Swift.
When it comes to payload, VW Polo evident takes the win – 457 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 161 kg.
The VW Polo proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
VW Polo is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.
details
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
The Polo is a small car with surprisingly grown-up refinement, delivering comfortable packaging, crisp handling and a build quality that punches above its class. For buyers who want a practical, fuss-free hatch that still feels a little premium, it’s a sensible, slightly cheeky choice you’ll enjoy every day.
details
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
|
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
|
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
17100 - 21200 £
|
Price
17000 - 30400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
98 - 110 g/km
|
co2
116 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1069 - 1145 kg
|
Curb weight
1143 - 1378 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
265 L
|
Trunk capacity
351 L
|
|
Length
3860 mm
|
Length
4074 mm
|
|
Width
1735 mm
|
Width
1751 mm
|
|
Height
1485 - 1510 mm
|
Height
1431 - 1451 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
980 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1125 L
|
|
Payload
282 - 296 kg
|
Payload
432 - 457 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
82 HP
|
Power HP
80 - 207 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 15.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
171 - 240 km/h
|
|
Torque
112 Nm
|
Torque
93 - 320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
61 kW
|
Power kW
59 - 152 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1197 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
VW
|
The Suzuki Swift is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España