Compare performance (184 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 29,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Vitara or Nissan Qashqai?
In the ever-evolving world of compact SUVs, the Nissan Qashqai and Suzuki Vitara have carved out their individual niches. Both vehicles boast a dynamic blend of style, efficiency, and technology, making them strong contenders in the market. In this article, we will explore the technical specifications, innovations, and unique offerings of both models to help potential buyers make an informed decision.
The Nissan Qashqai stands at 4425mm in length, 1835mm in width, and 1625mm in height, giving it a robust presence on the road. Weighing between 1420kg and 1665kg, the Qashqai offers a spacious interior designed for comfort and practicality with a trunk capacity of up to 504 liters.
In contrast, the Suzuki Vitara is slightly smaller, measuring 4185mm in length, 1775mm in width, and 1595mm in height. With a curb weight ranging from 1255kg to 1395kg, the Vitara’s lighter construction enhances maneuverability. However, it sacrifices a bit of cargo space with a trunk capacity of 375 liters, which may be a consideration for families or adventurers needing additional storage.
The Qashqai offers a range of engine options, including petrol mild hybrid and full hybrid variants, with outputs between 140 to 190 horsepower. Notably, it can achieve a fuel consumption as low as 5.1 L/100km, coupled with torque figures ranging from 240 to 330 Nm. The Qashqai also impressively accelerates from 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.9 seconds, depending on the variant chosen. Drivers can choose between manual and automatic transmissions, including a continuously variable transmission (CVT), further enhancing the driving experience.
On the other hand, the Vitara features lower power outputs, peaking at 129 horsepower. It also employs petrol mild hybrid technology, achieving fuel consumption figures as efficient as 5.0 L/100km. The Vitara’s torque output is rated at 235 Nm, and its acceleration times show a wider range, with the quickest variant reaching 100 km/h in 9.5 seconds. Transmission options include manual and automated manual selections, providing adequate versatility for various driving styles.
Both models embrace modern technology, enhancing the driving experience. The Nissan Qashqai is equipped with an advanced driver assistance system that includes features like adaptive cruise control, emergency braking, and lane departure warning, all aimed at increasing safety on the road. Additionally, the Qashqai integrates smart connectivity options such as smartphone mirroring and an intuitive infotainment system.
The Suzuki Vitara also emphasizes safety with features like autonomous emergency braking and a lane-keeping assist system. While it may not have all the bells and whistles of the Qashqai, the Vitara provides a user-friendly infotainment system with connectivity options that cater to today’s tech-savvy drivers.
When evaluating the environmental footprint, the Qashqai shines with lower CO2 emissions ranging from 116 g/km to 154 g/km, classifying it within various CO2 efficiency ratings from E to D. This is a substantial aspect for environmentally conscious consumers.
The Suzuki Vitara, while efficient, produces higher emissions at rates between 113 g/km and 129 g/km, placing it within the C to D efficiency classes. Although it presents commendable performance, the Qashqai holds an edge in eco-friendliness.
Choosing between the Nissan Qashqai and Suzuki Vitara ultimately depends on personal preferences and needs. The Qashqai leans towards a more powerful and feature-rich offering with advanced technology, safety, and efficiency advantages. Meanwhile, the Vitara provides a lightweight and agile alternative, appealing for those seeking reliability and practicality in a compact SUV.
Whether navigating city streets or exploring the great outdoors, both the Nissan Qashqai and Suzuki Vitara present compelling choices for consumers looking to balance performance, efficiency, and innovative technology in a competitive segment. The next step is to test drive both models to discover which one feels right for you!
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Suzuki Vitara is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,034 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Qashqai uses 4.5 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai offers somewhat more power – delivering 205 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 21 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.6 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Nissan Qashqai is marginally faster – reaching 206 km/h, while the Suzuki Vitara tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 16 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Qashqai delivers very slightly more torque with 330 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 23 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is slightly lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,420 kg. The difference is around 165 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers clearly more boot space – 504 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 129 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Nissan Qashqai offers markedly more capacity – up to 1,447 L, about 327 L more than the Suzuki Vitara.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Qashqai carries a bit more – 520 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 95 kg.
The Suzuki Vitara sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.
details
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 138 g/km
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,665 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
|
Length
4,185 mm
|
Length
4,425 mm
|
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
Width
1,835 mm
|
|
Height
1,595 mm
|
Height
1,625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,046 - 1,120 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,422 - 1,447 L
|
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 12.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,373 - 1,462 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España