Compare performance (380 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota bZ4X or Hyundai Kona?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The compact SUV market has seen an infusion of innovation with the introduction of the 2024 Hyundai Kona and the 2024/2025 Toyota bZ4X. Both vehicles promise a modern take on the driving experience, catering to both traditionalists and tech-savvy drivers. Let’s take a closer look at how these two contenders stack up against each other.
The Hyundai Kona offers a versatile engine lineup that includes petrol, full hybrid, and all-electric options, showcasing its commitment to flexibility. The petrol variant kicks off with a modest 100 HP and goes up to a more enthusiastic 170 HP. Electric options further raise the bar, providing up to 218 HP, which is complemented by a torque of 255 Nm. On the other hand, the Toyota bZ4X, focusing solely on electric powertrains, delivers robust performance with options at 204 HP and 218 HP, backed by torque figures ranging from 265 Nm to 336 Nm.
Acceleration is another area of interest. The Kona manages a sprint from 0-100km/h in as little as 7.8 seconds for its quickest variant, while the bZ4X achieves a slightly quicker time of 6.9 seconds. These figures show both vehicles to be adequately capable for urban settings and highway cruising.
Efficiency plays a critical role, particularly for electric models. The Hyundai Kona’s electric variants offer consumption rates of 14.6 to 16.8 kWh/100km and boast a range between 377 km and 514 km, thanks to battery capacities of up to 65.4 kWh. Meanwhile, Toyota's bZ4X slightly edges out the Kona with consumption rates from 14.4 to 16.2 kWh/100km and an impressive range of up to 513 km on a full charge.
While both vehicles offer a five-door layout with seating for five, their sizes differ slightly. The Hyundai Kona’s compact dimensions (length of 4350 mm to 4385 mm and width of 1825 mm) make it ideal for urban maneuverability. In contrast, the Toyota bZ4X, being larger with a length of 4690 mm and a width of 1860 mm, provides more interior space, which is particularly beneficial for family use and longer trips.
Trunk space is another differential; the Kona offers a trunk capacity of 466 liters, slightly more than the bZ4X's 452 liters, making it a better choice for carrying luggage or other bulky items.
Both vehicles excel in minimizing carbon footprint. The electric models of both the Hyundai Kona and the Toyota bZ4X carry a CO2 efficiency class of A, emitting 0 g/km CO2, which aligns with stringent new environmental standards. This focus on sustainability highlights the automakers' commitment to creating greener transportation solutions.
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and Toyota bZ4X largely depends on the buyer’s priorities. The Kona is ideal for those who value versatility and the option of hybrid technology, while the bZ4X is suited for those committed to all-electric driving with ample space and slightly swifter acceleration. These SUVs showcase the latest in automotive innovation, delivering compelling choices for the modern driver looking to the future.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Hyundai Kona is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Toyota bZ4X costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,277 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota bZ4X is marginally more efficient: consuming 13.5 kWh/100km compared to 14.6 kWh/100km for the Hyundai Kona. That’s a difference of about 1.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Toyota bZ4X offers a bit more range – reaching up to 591 km, about 81 km more than the Hyundai Kona.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota bZ4X offers considerably more power – delivering 380 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 176 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota bZ4X is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 8.1 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota bZ4X delivers visibly more torque with 338 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 73 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Kona is noticeably lighter – 1,370 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 530 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Toyota bZ4X offers markedly more boot space – 669 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 203 L.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota bZ4X carries slightly more – 565 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.
The Toyota bZ4X is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Toyota bZ4X is an electric crossover that focuses on a calm ride, practical interior and predictable handling for everyday driving. It suits buyers who want an easygoing, reliable EV with Toyota's familiar build quality and a clean, simple design.
details
The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,800 - 51,000 £
|
Price
23,600 - 41,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
444 - 591 km
|
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,180 kg
|
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
452 - 669 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
375 - 565 kg
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
167 - 380 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
123 - 280 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
|
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España