VS

Toyota Proace City Compact Van vs Volvo XC40 comparison

Compare performance (136 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (21,200 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota Proace City Compact Van or Volvo XC40?

Toyota Proace City Compact Van vs Volvo XC40: Key differences

Toyota Proace City Compact Van

  • substantially cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • clearly lighter

Volvo XC40

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Proace City Compact Van

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Toyota Proace City Compact Van is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,200 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,582 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Proace City Compact Van uses 5.2 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.

XC40

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 offers markedly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Toyota Proace City Compact Van takes 11.1 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van is marginally faster – reaching 186 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.

Both models offer the same torque – 300 Nm.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota Proace City Compact Van is clearly lighter – 1,358 kg compared to 1,688 kg. The difference is around 330 kg.

For maximum load capacity, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van offers clearly more capacity – up to 4,300 L, about 2,972 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van carries substantially more – 921 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 389 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota Proace City Compact Van stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,200
Proace City Compact Van

Toyota Proace City Compact Van

  • Engine Type : Electric, Diesel, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 102 - 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.2 - 6.6 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 337 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Toyota Proace City Compact Van
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Toyota Proace City Compact Van

The Toyota Proace City Compact Van is a city-savvy workhorse that packs surprising practicality and smart packaging into a friendly, easy-to-drive package. It’s the kind of van that gets the job done without fuss — reliable, economical and just sensible enough to make fleet managers smile.

details
serpimg_VmF7qO

Reviews Toyota Proace City Compact Van

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo XC40

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (4 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
Peugeot 3008
Volvo XC40
VS
The Peugeot 3008 is the extrovert of the pair—bold styling, a quirky, techy interior and strong value that make it a fun crossover to live with, while the Volvo XC40 plays the long game with understated Scandinavian style, class-leading safety and a more premium feel. Pick the 3008 if you want …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Hyundai Tucson
Volvo XC40
VS
The Hyundai Tucson turns heads with bold styling, generous kit and wallet-friendly practicality, while the Volvo XC40 answers with crisp Scandinavian design, a cosseting cabin and a premium badge that justifies the extra euros. If you want bang-for-buck family usability and lots of equipment go …
Lexus LBX
Volvo XC40
VS
The Lexus LBX is a chic, compact premium crossover that trades the XC40's boxy utility for Japanese finesse — quieter, more refined and aimed at city buyers who value style and efficiency. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a more rugged, practical choice with more interior space, stronger safety tech …
CUPRA Formentor
Volvo XC40
VS
The CUPRA Formentor is a punchy, coupe-styled compact SUV whose sharp chassis and spicy engines deliver grin-inducing drive and looks that demand attention; the Volvo XC40 answers with calm Scandinavian poise, clever practicality and safety tech that makes daily life feel worry-free. If you crave …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
The Honda CR‑V is the sensible family SUV — cavernous boot, comfortable ride and rock‑solid reliability that keeps running costs down, while the Volvo XC40 tempts you with Scandi styling, cutting‑edge safety tech and a more premium, tactile cabin. Choose the CR‑V for everyday practicality and …
Lexus NX
Volvo XC40
VS
The Lexus NX and Volvo XC40 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Toyota Proace City Compact Van
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,200 - 37,300 £
Price
36,800 - 47,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
337 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 150 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 61 L
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,358 - 1,837 kg
Curb weight
1,688 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4,401 - 4,751 mm
Length
4,425 mm
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,863 mm
Height
1,860 mm
Height
1,652 mm
Max trunk capacity
3,300 - 4,300 L
Max trunk capacity
1,328 L
Payload
560 - 921 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 13.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
135 - 186 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Toyota
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the Toyota Proace City Compact Van?

The Toyota Proace City Compact Van is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.