VS

Toyota Proace Transporter vs Volvo XC40 comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (31,600 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota Proace Transporter or Volvo XC40?

Toyota Proace Transporter vs Volvo XC40: Key differences

Toyota Proace Transporter

  • noticeably cheaper
  • barely more efficient
  • barely lighter
details

Volvo XC40

4.9 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Proace Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Toyota Proace Transporter is noticeably cheaper – starting at 31,600 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,270 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Proace Transporter uses 6.4 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

XC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 offers noticeably more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Toyota Proace Transporter takes 12.1 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota Proace Transporter delivers slightly more torque with 370 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Toyota Proace Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota Proace Transporter is barely lighter – 1,656 kg compared to 1,688 kg. The difference is around 32 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota Proace Transporter carries significantly more – 1,323 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 791 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota Proace Transporter stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £31,600
Proace Transporter

Toyota Proace Transporter

  • Engine Type Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 120 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.4 - 6.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 23.8 - 23.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 349 km
Toyota Proace Transporter
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Toyota Proace Transporter

The Toyota Proace Transporter is a no-nonsense work van that pairs Toyota’s dependable reputation with smart practicality, so you can load, drive and finish the job without unnecessary drama. It won’t win design awards, but with a comfortable cab, sensible feature set and a focus on getting things done, it quietly keeps fleets and small businesses smiling.

details

Volvo XC40

The Volvo XC40 blends Scandinavian design with practical versatility, offering a compact luxury crossover that feels composed and easy to live with. It’s refined and focused on safety with a high-quality interior, making it a smart choice for daily city driving and weekend escapes.

details
Toyota Proace Transporter
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption

Price
31,600 - 51,000 £
Price
41,900 - 46,100 £
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
23.8 - 23.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
349 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 177 g/km
co2
148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
3 - 6
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,656 - 2,100 kg
Curb weight
1,688 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,863 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
955 - 1,323 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
120 - 150 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
260 - 370 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
88 - 110 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, A, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Toyota
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.