VS

Toyota RAV4 vs Volvo XC90 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Two cars, one duel: Toyota RAV4 meets Volvo XC90.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

RAV4 @ Toyota

Introduction: The Battle of the SUVs

In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, two models stand out: the Toyota RAV4 and the Volvo XC90. Both vehicles offer distinct advantages, catering to different customer preferences and driving needs. This article delves into a detailed comparison of their technical specifications and innovative features to help you decide which SUV suits you best.

XC90 @ media.volvocars.com

Design and Dimensions

The design of an SUV plays a vital role in its appeal, and both the RAV4 and XC90 have made strong statements in this regard. The RAV4 measures 4600 mm in length, 1855 mm in width, and 1685 mm in height. On the other hand, the XC90 is significantly larger, with a length of 4953 mm, a width of 1923 mm, and a height of 1771 mm. This size difference translates into a more spacious interior in the XC90, which can comfortably accommodate seven passengers compared to the RAV4's five-seat configuration.

RAV4 @ Toyota

Powertrain and Performance

The Toyota RAV4 offers a variety of engine options, including full hybrid and plug-in hybrid versions. Its power output ranges from 218 to 306 HP, depending on the variant, with a fuel consumption rate as low as 5.6 L/100 km. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h ranges from 6 to 8.4 seconds, making it both efficient and peppy for city driving.

In contrast, the Volvo XC90 presents a different approach with its petrol mild-hybrid and plug-in hybrid powertrains. Its power output peaks at an impressive 455 HP, and while its fuel consumption hits about 8.5 L/100 km, it compensates with a swift acceleration of just 5.4 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h in its most powerful variant. The XC90 also boasts a robust torque output ranging from 360 Nm to 709 Nm, enhancing its performance.

XC90 @ media.volvocars.com

Transmission and Drive Configuration

Both models come equipped with automatic transmissions, yet they differ in their configuration. The RAV4 utilizes a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT), offering smooth gear changes and improving fuel efficiency. Customers can opt for either front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, enhancing versatility in different driving conditions.

Conversely, the XC90 features an automatic gearbox with an all-wheel drive system, designed to provide superior traction and stability in varied road conditions. This makes the XC90 a more appealing option for those who often drive in challenging terrains.

RAV4 @ Toyota

Interior Features and Comfort

Interior comfort is paramount in any family SUV. The RAV4 features a practical trunk capacity of up to 580 liters, making it ideal for daily errands or road trips. Its flexible seating configuration allows for various setups to maximize cargo space. However, with only five seats, it may not be as accommodating for larger families.

The XC90, with its seven-seat arrangement, sacrifices trunk space, offering up to 302 liters with all seats in use. Still, it compensates with high-quality materials and a luxurious feel. The Volvo's focus on safety and technology offers features that create a serene driving experience, accented by its advanced infotainment system.

XC90 @ media.volvocars.com

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

When it comes to eco-friendliness, the RAV4 excels with a minimum CO2 emission of 126 g/km, placing it in CO2 efficiency class D to B. Additionally, its hybrid options enhance its environmental credentials.

The XC90, while offering a high-performance hybrid option, has a higher CO2 emission level of 191 g/km in its petrol variant, but stands at a commendable 30 g/km for its plug-in hybrid, sitting in class B. This shows Volvo’s commitment to greener technology, making it an attractive choice for environmentally-conscious consumers.

RAV4 @ Toyota

Conclusion: Choosing the Right SUV for You

Ultimately, the choice between the Toyota RAV4 and the Volvo XC90 hinges on your specific needs. If you prioritize compactness, efficiency, and affordability, the RAV4 shines as an excellent option. On the other hand, if you seek luxury, advanced safety features, and seating for more, the XC90 is hard to ignore. Both vehicles represent their brands well, showcasing innovation and reliability. Choosing one may ultimately boil down to personal preference and lifestyle requirements.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC90 @ media.volvocars.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Toyota RAV4 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 35100 £, while the Volvo XC90 costs 69800 £. That’s a price difference of around 34628 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota RAV4 manages with 1 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Volvo XC90 with 3.50 L. The difference is about 2.50 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Toyota RAV4 performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 75 km, about 4 km more than the Volvo XC90.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 has a distinct edge – offering 455 HP compared to 306 HP. That’s roughly 149 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Toyota RAV4 takes 6 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Volvo XC90 offers noticeable more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Toyota RAV4 is slightly lighter – 1745 kg compared to 2080 kg. The difference is around 335 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Toyota RAV4 offers decisively more room – 580 L compared to 302 L. That’s a difference of about 278 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC90 performs barely noticeable better – up to 1856 L, which is about 166 L more than the Toyota RAV4.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC90 to a small extent takes the win – 710 kg compared to 600 kg. That’s a difference of about 110 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Toyota RAV4 shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £35,100
73487-rav4prexterior34front-web-lr

Toyota RAV4

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 218 - 306 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1 - 5.6 L
  • Electric Range : 75 km
details

Toyota RAV4

5 (1)
rate

The Toyota RAV4 stands out in the crowded SUV market with its distinct design, embodying a blend of robustness and style. Its cabin provides a harmonious fusion of comfort and practicality, offering plenty of space for both passengers and luggage. This vehicle is engineered to deliver a smooth driving experience, whether manoeuvring through city streets or exploring winding country roads.

details
73487-rav4prexterior34front-web-lr @ Toyota
73488-rav4prexterior34rear-web-lr @ Toyota
77636-2023rav4ext001-web-lr @ Toyota
73489-rav4printeriordashboard-web-lr @ Toyota

Volvo XC90

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC90 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design, seamlessly blending luxury with versatility. Inside, it offers a spacious and meticulously crafted interior, showcasing high-quality materials and advanced technology. The vehicle provides a comfortable and smooth driving experience, making it a popular choice for families and long journeys.

details
294665_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue @ media.volvocars.com
294657_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue @ media.volvocars.com
294651_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue @ media.volvocars.com
248324_XC90_Plug-In_Hybrid_Inscription_T8_-_Seat_Configuration @ media.volvocars.com
294870_XC90_Recharge_interior @ media.volvocars.com

Similar Comparisons

Toyota RAV4
Dacia Bigster
VS
Put the ever-reliable Toyota RAV4 next to the newcomer Dacia Bigster and you get two sensible SUVs with very different appeals: the RAV4 delivers years of refinement, hybrid efficiency and a quietly premium cabin, while the Bigster trades polish for cavernous space and a wallet-friendly price. If you value low running costs, strong resale and fuss-free ownership, the RAV4 is the safe, sensible pick; if you need room for family, kit and a tight budget, the Bigster is a clever, no-nonsense bargain. Both will get you where you need to go — one with quiet confidence, the other with bold value and a grin.
Volvo XC90
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC90 is the serene, safety-obsessed family flagship—roomy, plush and blessed with Volvo’s calm Scandinavian style and efficient hybrid options that make long hauls a pleasure. The VW Tayron, by contrast, is the scrappy value player: sharper to drive, loaded with slick tech for less money, but it can’t quite match the XC90’s space, refinement or badge cachet—pick methodical comfort or cheeky bargain brilliance.
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC90
RAV4
XC90

Costs and Consumption
Price
35100 - 55700 £
Price
69800 - 84600 £
Consumption L/100km
1 - 5.6 L
Consumption L/100km
3.5 - 8.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
75 km
Electric Range
71 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
co2
22 - 128 g/km
co2
79 - 191 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1745 - 1910 kg
Curb weight
2080 - 2297 kg
Trunk capacity
520 - 580 L
Trunk capacity
262 - 302 L
Length
4600 mm
Length
4953 mm
Width
1855 mm
Width
1923 mm
Height
1685 mm
Height
1771 mm
Max trunk capacity
1604 - 1690 L
Max trunk capacity
1816 - 1856 L
Payload
390 - 600 kg
Payload
653 - 710 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
218 - 306 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
-
Torque
360 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
160 - 225 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
2487 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Toyota
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Toyota RAV4
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Toyota RAV4 stands out with its impressive fuel efficiency and reputation for reliability. Meanwhile, the Volkswagen Tayron impresses with its sleek design and tech-savvy interior, appealing to those who prioritize a modern driving experience. While the RAV4 excels in versatility and off-road capability, the Tayron offers a more engaging drive, making the choice between the two a matter of personal preference.
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
Toyota RAV4
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact cars, the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports offers a unique blend of practicality and style, making it an appealing choice for urban drivers. In contrast, the Toyota RAV4, with its robust design and advanced features, caters to those seeking adventure and versatility. Ultimately, the decision between these two models hinges on individual needs, whether it's the sporty efficiency of the Corolla Touring Sports or the rugged capability of the RAV4.
Suzuki Across
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Suzuki Across and Toyota RAV4 share a striking resemblance in design and performance, given their close relationship as part of the same platform. While both models offer impressive hybrid efficiency, the Suzuki Across distinguishes itself with a unique set of features and a slightly sportier driving experience. Ultimately, choosing between the two may come down to brand loyalty and specific preference in styling and infotainment systems.
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 each bring their unique strengths to the table. The RAV4 excels with its reliability and spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for families who prioritize practicality. In contrast, the XC60 offers a luxurious experience with advanced safety features and a refined design, appealing to those who seek a more premium driving experience.
Renault Rafale
Toyota RAV4
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Renault Rafale and Toyota RAV4 stand out with their distinctive designs and robust features. While the Rafale boasts a stylish exterior and a focus on sporty performance, the RAV4 is renowned for its reliability and all-terrain capabilities. Ultimately, choosing between these two appealing options will hinge on personal preferences for driving experience and utility.
BYD Seal U
Toyota RAV4
VS
In the battle of versatility and innovation, the BYD Seal U offers a sleek, modern design paired with impressive electric efficiency, positioning itself as a strong contender in the SUV market. Meanwhile, the Toyota RAV4 continues to be a favorite among consumers for its reliability, spacious interior, and robust hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice between the two comes down to personal preference: the tech-savvy allure of the Seal U or the tried-and-true practicality of the RAV4.
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may come down to personal preference in style versus functionality, as both models cater to the needs of modern families.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
In the realm of family SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC90 stand as formidable contenders. The Skoda Kodiaq entices with its impressive practicality, value for money, and versatile seven-seat configuration, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious families. On the other hand, the Volvo XC90 exudes Scandinavian luxury, offering cutting-edge safety features, premium interior materials, and a more refined driving experience, albeit at a higher price point.
What drive types are available for the Toyota RAV4?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.