VS

Toyota Urban Cruiser vs Mercedes Vito Bus comparison

Compare performance (184 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 36,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota Urban Cruiser or Mercedes Vito Bus?

Toyota Urban Cruiser vs Mercedes Vito Bus: Key differences

Toyota Urban Cruiser

4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
  • a bit lighter
details

Mercedes Vito Bus

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • significantly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Urban Cruiser

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Toyota Urban Cruiser is very slightly cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Mercedes Vito Bus costs 36,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,910 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota Urban Cruiser is considerably more efficient: consuming 15.1 kWh/100km compared to 26.7 kWh/100km for the Mercedes Vito Bus. That’s a difference of about 11.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota Urban Cruiser offers moderately more range – reaching up to 426 km, about 56 km more than the Mercedes Vito Bus.

Vito Bus

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Vito Bus offers markedly more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 53 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Vito Bus delivers clearly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 193 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mercedes Vito Bus offers more seats – 8 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota Urban Cruiser is a bit lighter – 1,839 kg compared to 2,023 kg. The difference is around 184 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes Vito Bus offers significantly more boot space – 1,390 L compared to 310 L. That’s a difference of about 1,080 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Vito Bus carries clearly more – 1,077 kg compared to 421 kg. That’s a difference of about 656 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes Vito Bus is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,300
Vito Bus

Mercedes Vito Bus

  • Engine Type Diesel, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 136 - 237 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.7 - 10 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 26.7 - 26.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 248 - 370 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes Vito Bus
Mercedes V Class
VS
Think workhorse: the Mercedes Vito Bus is a rugged, no-nonsense people carrier that puts practicality, payload and value first — ideal for fleets or families who need space without fuss. The Mercedes V‑Class, by contrast, dresses the same basic idea in luxury leather, tech and a whisper-quiet ride, …
Toyota Corolla Cross
Toyota Urban Cruiser
VS
Choosing between the Toyota Corolla Cross and the Toyota Urban Cruiser comes down to whether you value roomy comfort and composed road manners or compact agility and city-friendly practicality. The Corolla Cross leans toward better interior space and highway refinement, while the Urban Cruiser is …
Toyota Urban Cruiser
Mercedes Vito Bus

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Toyota Urban Cruiser

The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a compact SUV that offers a blend of style and practicality, making it well-suited for urban living. It captures attention with its bold design, while providing a high driving position that enhances visibility and control on city roads. Inside, the Urban Cruiser offers comfortable seating and a range of features that cater to both driver and passengers, emphasizing convenience and everyday usability.

details
serpimg_OTMQ0U

Reviews Toyota Urban Cruiser

4 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mercedes Vito Bus

The Mercedes Vito is a sturdy, no-nonsense people carrier that blends commercial practicality with a surprisingly civilised cabin, making long shuttles feel less like a chore. If you need a dependable transporter that swallows luggage, forgives hard use and still looks a touch more premium than a plain van, the Vito is an easy, sensible pick.

details
img-0323

Reviews Mercedes Vito Bus

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Juan Ramírez
8 Apr 2026, 04:49:28

Comfort, useful space and engine — all good. It only seats two occupants, unless you ask otherwise.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Urban Cruiser
VS
The Toyota Yaris Cross feels like the posh city slicker — sharper to drive, better finished and available with efficient hybrid tech — while the Toyota Urban Cruiser plays the sensible sidekick: cheaper, simpler and easier to live with. Pick the Yaris Cross if you want refinement and economy, …
Kia EV3
Toyota Urban Cruiser
VS
Here’s a quick DriveDuel comparison of the Kia EV3 vs the Toyota Urban Cruiser. The Kia EV3 is a compact electric SUV built around range, modern tech and low running costs, while the Toyota Urban Cruiser is a city-focused compact crossover offering practical space, conventional powertrains and …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Urban Cruiser
VS
The Toyota C-HR and Toyota Urban Cruiser are both compact crossovers but they target different priorities: the C-HR emphasizes bold, coupe-like styling and a sportier driving character, while the Urban Cruiser is a practical, city-focused small SUV that prioritizes visibility, easy parking and …
Toyota Urban Cruiser
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Comparing the Toyota Urban Cruiser and the Toyota C-HR, you’re choosing between a practical, city-focused compact SUV that emphasizes efficiency and easy maneuverability and a more stylized, tech-forward crossover that leans toward a sportier driving feel and premium touches. If your priority is …
Suzuki Across
Toyota Urban Cruiser
VS
Comparing the Suzuki Across and the Toyota Urban Cruiser clarifies a trade-off between a larger, fuel-efficient plug-in SUV and a compact, city-focused crossover. The Across suits buyers after electric range, stronger performance and more interior space, while the Urban Cruiser is easier to park, …
Toyota RAV4
Toyota Urban Cruiser
VS
The Toyota RAV4 and Toyota Urban Cruiser aim at different buyers: the RAV4 is a larger, more capable and comfortable compact SUV, while the Urban Cruiser is a smaller, city-focused crossover that prioritizes maneuverability and efficiency. This comparison looks at practicality, driving character, …
Suzuki Vitara
Toyota Urban Cruiser
VS
Unsure whether the Suzuki Vitara or the Toyota Urban Cruiser is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Toyota bZ4X
Toyota Urban Cruiser
VS
Unsure whether the Toyota bZ4X or the Toyota Urban Cruiser is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Toyota Urban Cruiser
Mercedes Vito Bus

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,400 - 38,600 £
Price
36,300 - 55,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 10 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
26.7 - 26.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
395 - 426 km
Electric Range
248 - 370 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 228 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Bus
Seats
5
Seats
8
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
1,839 - 1,939 kg
Curb weight
2,023 - 2,739 kg
Trunk capacity
306 - 310 L
Trunk capacity
580 - 1,390 L
Length
-
Length
4,895 - 5,370 mm
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,928 mm
Height
-
Height
1,890 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
4,190 - 4,990 L
Payload
411 - 421 kg
Payload
726 - 1,077 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
174 - 184 HP
Power HP
136 - 237 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 8.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
140 km/h
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
Torque
330 - 500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
128 - 135 kW
Power kW
100 - 174 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Toyota
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drive types are available for the Toyota Urban Cruiser?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.