VS

Volvo EC40 vs BYD Atto 2 comparison

Compare performance (442 HP vs 212 HP), boot space and price (46,600 £ vs 27,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EC40 or BYD Atto 2?

Volvo EC40 vs BYD Atto 2: Key differences

Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • markedly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h

BYD Atto 2

5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • visibly lighter
  • a bit more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EC40

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

BYD Atto 2 is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,400 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,200 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the BYD Atto 2 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 15.8 kWh/100km compared to 16.2 kWh/100km for the Volvo EC40. That’s a difference of about 0.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EC40 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 584 km, about 154 km more than the BYD Atto 2.

Atto 2

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers substantially more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 212 HP. That’s roughly 230 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the BYD Atto 2 takes 7.5 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EC40 delivers clearly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 310 Nm. That’s about 360 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, BYD Atto 2 is visibly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 555 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BYD Atto 2 offers a bit more boot space – 450 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 46 L.

When it comes to payload, the BYD Atto 2 carries slightly more – 490 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EC40 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £46,600
EC40

Volvo EC40

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 488 - 584 km
Volvo EC40
BYD Atto 2

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Volvo EC40

The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.

details

BYD Atto 2

The Atto 2 is making waves in the electric vehicle market with its sleek design and impressive range. This innovative model combines cutting-edge technology with captivating aesthetics, making it a standout choice for eco-conscious drivers. With its spacious interior and advanced features, the Atto 2 offers both comfort and convenience for everyday use.

details
Volvo EC40
BYD Atto 2

Costs and Consumption

Price
46,600 - 59,000 £
Price
27,400 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16 kWh/100km
Electric Range
488 - 584 km
Electric Range
40 - 430 km
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 41 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
Curb weight
1,510 - 1,720 kg
Trunk capacity
404 L
Trunk capacity
400 - 450 L
Length
4,440 mm
Length
-
Width
1,873 mm
Width
1,830 mm
Height
1,591 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,196 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
395 - 435 kg
Payload
260 - 490 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Power HP
166 - 212 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 9.1 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Torque
290 - 310 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Power kW
122 - 156 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, B
Brand
Volvo
Brand
BYD
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.