VS

Volvo EC40 vs Mercedes EQA comparison

Compare performance (442 HP vs 292 HP), boot space and price (46,600 £ vs 44,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EC40 or Mercedes EQA?

Volvo EC40 vs Mercedes EQA: Key differences

Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • marginally more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately more trunk space

Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • somewhat more efficient
  • barely lighter
EC40

Introduction: A New Era of Compact Electric SUVs

As the automotive industry pivots towards electrification, the compact SUV segment is rapidly gaining traction among eco-conscious consumers. Two formidable contenders in this space are the Mercedes EQA and the Volvo EC40. These electric SUVs offer a blend of luxury, performance, and sustainability, vying for supremacy. Let’s delve into their technical aspects and innovative features to see how they stack up against each other.

EQA

Performance and Power: A Tale of Two Drives

The Mercedes EQA is equipped with an electric motor producing between 190 and 292 HP, available in both front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations. Its acceleration ranges from 8.6 to a brisk 6 seconds for 0 to 100 km/h, depending on the variant. With a maximum speed of 160 km/h, the EQA delivers a solid driving experience.

On the other hand, the Volvo EC40 offers slightly more potent performance options, producing between 238 and 408 HP. Available with rear-wheel and all-wheel drive options, it accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in as fast as 4.6 seconds. Its top speed reaches 180 km/h, showcasing Volvo’s commitment to safety without compromising excitement.

Range and Efficiency: Where Distance Meets Economy

The EQA provides a commendable electric range, extending from 458 to 561 km on a single charge, with consumption varying from 14.4 to 16.9 kWh/100km. Its battery capacity ranges from 66.5 to 70.5 kWh, perfectly balancing power with efficiency.

Meanwhile, the EC40 competes fiercely with a range of 487 to 584 km, and energy consumption spanning from 16.2 to 17.3 kWh/100km. Boasting a slightly larger battery capacity of up to 79 kWh, the EC40 impresses with its efficiency over long distances.

Design and Dimensions: Crafting the Aesthetic

In terms of design, the EQA and EC40 are both quintessential examples of their brands. The EQA measures 4463 mm in length, 1834 mm in width, and up to 1613 mm in height, offering a compact yet substantial presence. Mercedes' signature styling and aerodynamic efficiency are evident throughout.

The EC40 stands slightly shorter, measuring 4440 mm in length and 1591 mm in height but rewards with greater width at 1873 mm. Volvo's contemporary design language shines, harmonizing aesthetics with function.

Interior Comfort and Space: Luxury Meets Utility

Both models seat up to five passengers comfortably. The EQA offers a trunk capacity of 340 liters, suitable for everyday needs. With the focus on luxury, Mercedes has integrated high-end materials and technology to enhance the driving experience.

The EC40 outmatches with a more generous trunk space of 404 liters, presenting Volvo's dedication to practicality. Interior design is infused with Scandinavian minimalism, offering both style and functionality.

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Fit

In choosing between the Mercedes EQA and Volvo EC40, buyers are treated to top-tier innovation and distinct personality traits. The EQA appeals to those seeking a blend of luxury and efficiency, complemented by Mercedes' hallmark features. Meanwhile, the EC40 caters to performance enthusiasts who prioritize cutting-edge design and spirited driving dynamics.

Ultimately, both models validate the shift towards electrification, representing a significant stride towards sustainable urban mobility. Whether you prefer the German precision of the EQA or the Scandinavian charm of the EC40, both of these electric SUVs represent the future of sustainable luxury.

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes EQA
Volvo EX40
VS
The Mercedes EQA wraps premium Mercedes poise and MBUX polish into a compact EV that feels cosseting and refined, while the Volvo EX40 trades a bit of showroom gloss for Scandi practicality, airy space and a more efficient, no‑nonsense driving character. If you want badge and cabin glamour, go EQA; …
Mercedes EQA
VW ID.4
VS
The Mercedes EQA feels like a compact EV dressed for the boardroom — polished interior, serene ride and undeniable badge prestige, but you trade off some cabin space and a modest range for the name. The VW ID.4 is the sensible opposite: roomy, practical and better value with more usable range, …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EC40

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mercedes EQA is marginally cheaper – starting at 44,200 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,383 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQA is somewhat more efficient: consuming 14.4 kWh/100km compared to 16.2 kWh/100km for the Volvo EC40. That’s a difference of about 1.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EC40 offers marginally more range – reaching up to 584 km, about 23 km more than the Mercedes EQA.

EQA

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers markedly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 150 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 6 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Volvo EC40 is somewhat faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mercedes EQA tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EC40 delivers visibly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 520 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQA is barely lighter – 2,045 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 20 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo EC40 offers moderately more boot space – 404 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 64 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQA offers only slightly more capacity – up to 1,320 L, about 124 L more than the Volvo EC40.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EC40 carries very slightly more – 435 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EC40 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £46,600
EC40

Volvo EC40

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 488 - 584 km
details
Volvo EC40
Mercedes EQA

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo EC40

The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.

details
310887_Volvo_C40_Recharge_Pure_Electric

Reviews Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mercedes EQA

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details
20C0579_017
20C0579_042
20C0579_040
20C0579_060

Reviews Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

BMW iX1
Mercedes EQA
VS
The BMW iX1 is the feisty compact EV that still drives like a BMW, with sharper handling and a practical cabin, while the Mercedes EQA prefers to charm you with a softer ride and a more polished, luxe interior. Choose the iX1 for driver engagement and better value, or the EQA if you want plush …
Mercedes EQA
Mercedes GLA
VS
In the battle of compact luxury, the Mercedes EQA and GLA offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. While the EQA stands out with its electric powertrain and eco-friendly appeal, the GLA retains the versatility and familiar dynamics of a traditional combustion engine. …
Mercedes CLA Coupe
Mercedes EQA
VS
In an electrifying matchup between the sleek Mercedes CLA Coupé and the innovative Mercedes EQA, drivers are offered a choice between potent gasoline dynamics and forward-thinking electric efficiency. The CLA Coupé enchants with its elegant design and turbocharged performance, tailored for driving …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EC40
VS
Volvo EX30 and Volvo EC40 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Volvo EC40
Volvo EX40
VS
In the latest head-to-head comparison of the Volvo EC40 and EX40, enthusiasts will appreciate the subtle design differences and performance variations that set these two electric models apart. While the EC40 leans toward a more rugged, SUV-like stance, the EX40 offers a sleek, urban vibe with its …
Volvo EC40
Volvo XC40
VS
Volvo EC40 and Volvo XC40 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mercedes EQA
VS
In the competitive electric SUV segment, the Audi Q4 e-tron and Mercedes EQA stand out with their distinct designs and cutting-edge technologies. The Q4 e-tron impresses with its spacious interior and advanced infotainment system, making it a practical choice for families. Meanwhile, the EQA offers …
BMW iX2
Mercedes EQA
VS
In the growing segment of electric compact SUVs, the BMW iX2 and Mercedes EQA stand out with their distinct charms and performance capabilities. The iX2 impresses with its sporty handling and innovative tech features, while the EQA offers a more luxurious and refined driving experience. Ultimately, …
Volvo EC40
Mercedes EQA

Costs and Consumption
Price
46,600 - 59,000 £
Price
44,200 - 57,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
488 - 584 km
Electric Range
476 - 561 km
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
Battery Capacity
70.5 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
Curb weight
2,045 - 2,115 kg
Trunk capacity
404 L
Trunk capacity
340 L
Length
4,440 mm
Length
4,463 mm
Width
1,873 mm
Width
1,834 mm
Height
1,591 mm
Height
1,608 - 1,613 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,196 L
Max trunk capacity
1,320 L
Payload
395 - 435 kg
Payload
425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
160 km/h
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Is the Volvo EC40 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.