Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Volvo S60 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison
Compare performance (455 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (42,500 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo S60 or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Volvo S60 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
S60
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Volvo S60 is barely cheaper – starting at 42,500 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 771 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo S60 uses 0.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.7 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo S60 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 94 km, about 27 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S60 offers considerably more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 186 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.2 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo S60 delivers visibly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 169 Nm more.
S60
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo S60 is only slightly lighter – 1,715 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 77 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers marginally more boot space – 472 L compared to 427 L. That’s a difference of about 45 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries visibly more – 600 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo S60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £42,500
Volvo S60
Volvo S60
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Volvo S60
The Volvo S60 wears Scandinavian understatement like a tailored suit, pairing a serene cabin with composed handling that makes the daily commute feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers after executive looks, rock‑solid safety and practical versatility — with a dash of discreet luxury — it's a persuasive pick that doesn't need to shout for attention.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Volvo S60
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42,500 - 65,100 £
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
94 km
|
Electric Range
67 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
16 - 161 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,715 - 2,039 kg
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
390 - 427 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4,778 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
|
Height
1,431 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
461 - 475 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.