VS

Volvo XC40 vs Lynk & Co 02 comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 30900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC40 or Lynk & Co 02?

Volvo XC40 vs Lynk & Co 02: Key differences

Volvo XC40

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly lighter
  • barely noticeable more trunk space

Lynk & Co 02

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • noticeable more power
  • clearly perceptible quicker from 0–100 km/h

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC40

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Lynk & Co 02 has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30900 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5910 £.

02

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 02 has a noticeable edge – offering 272 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 75 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 02 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.50 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.

There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Lynk & Co 02 pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 323 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 23 Nm difference.

XC40

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is slightly lighter – 1688 kg compared to 1895 kg. The difference is around 207 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers barely noticeable more room – 452 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Lynk & Co 02 performs minimal better – up to 1349 L, which is about 21 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 noticeable takes the win – 532 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 157 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 02 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
Peugeot 3008
Volvo XC40
VS
The Peugeot 3008 is the extrovert of the pair—bold styling, a quirky, techy interior and strong value that make it a fun crossover to live with, while the Volvo XC40 plays the long game with understated Scandinavian style, class-leading safety and a more premium feel. Pick the 3008 if you want …
Volvo XC40
Lynk & Co 02

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £30,900
02

Lynk & Co 02

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.1 - 17.6 kWh
  • Electric Range : 435 - 445 km
details

Volvo XC40

5 (4 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl

Lynk & Co 02

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Lynk & Co 02 wears its attitude like a leather jacket—bold styling and a youthful cabin that punches above its class, appealing to buyers who want personality as well as practicality. It's a genuinely engaging compact with everyday usability, offering enough flair and refinement to stand out in a crowded market without trying too hard.

details
serpimg_8xULuL

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (4 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Lynk & Co 02

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Volvo XC40
Lynk & Co 02

Costs and Consumption
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Price
30900 - 34300 £
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
147 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1688 kg
Curb weight
1895 kg
Trunk capacity
452 L
Trunk capacity
410 L
Length
4425 mm
Length
4460 mm
Width
1863 mm
Width
1845 mm
Height
1652 mm
Height
1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Max trunk capacity
1349 L
Payload
532 kg
Payload
375 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Power HP
272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.50 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Torque
323 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Power kW
200 kW
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Lynk & Co

Similar Comparisons

Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Hyundai Tucson
Volvo XC40
VS
The Hyundai Tucson turns heads with bold styling, generous kit and wallet-friendly practicality, while the Volvo XC40 answers with crisp Scandinavian design, a cosseting cabin and a premium badge that justifies the extra euros. If you want bang-for-buck family usability and lots of equipment go …
Honda HR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
The Honda HR-V is the clever, pragmatic compact SUV — roomy, economical and built for cost‑conscious buyers who want sensible packaging without fuss. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, feels like a grown‑up’s treat: pricier but wrapped in Scandinavian style, class‑leading safety tech and a premium cabin, …
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
Volvo XC40
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
Lexus LBX
Volvo XC40
VS
The Lexus LBX is a chic, compact premium crossover that trades the XC40's boxy utility for Japanese finesse — quieter, more refined and aimed at city buyers who value style and efficiency. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a more rugged, practical choice with more interior space, stronger safety tech …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
The Honda CR‑V is the sensible family SUV — cavernous boot, comfortable ride and rock‑solid reliability that keeps running costs down, while the Volvo XC40 tempts you with Scandi styling, cutting‑edge safety tech and a more premium, tactile cabin. Choose the CR‑V for everyday practicality and …
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC40?

The Volvo XC40 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.