VS

Volvo XC40 vs Lynk & Co 02 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Volvo XC40 or Lynk & Co 02 fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC40 @ media.volvocars.com

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Lynk & Co 02 has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30900 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 5910 £.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 02 has a noticeable edge – offering 272 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 75 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 02 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.50 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.

There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Lynk & Co 02 pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 323 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 23 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is slightly lighter – 1688 kg compared to 1895 kg. The difference is around 207 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers barely noticeable more room – 452 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Lynk & Co 02 performs minimal better – up to 1349 L, which is about 21 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 noticeable takes the win – 532 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 157 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Lynk & Co 02 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Lynk & Co 02 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £30,900

Lynk & Co 02

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.1 - 17.6 kWh
  • Electric Range : 435 - 445 km
details

Volvo XC40

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC40 is a standout model in the compact SUV segment, offering a delightful blend of Scandinavian design and practicality. Its interior is both stylish and functional, featuring premium materials and innovative storage solutions that make every journey comfortable. The car's performance is smooth and responsive, with advanced safety features ensuring peace of mind for drivers and passengers alike.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ media.volvocars.com
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ media.volvocars.com

Lynk & Co 02

The car 02 has captured the hearts of enthusiasts with its iconic design and engaging driving dynamics. Known for its lightweight build, it delivers a spirited performance that makes every twist and turn exhilarating. With its classic styling and a cabin that balances retro charm with modern comfort, the car 02 remains a true icon in the automotive world.

details

Similar Comparisons

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go Kuga; if you prefer a calmer, premium feel and a car that looks after you like a very fashionable safety blanket, choose the XC40.
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a plush cabin, class-leading safety tech and Scandinavian style, so pay extra if you want flair, refinement and that "I’m-driving-something-special" feeling.
Volvo XC40
Lynk & Co 02
XC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Price
30900 - 34300 £
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
147 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1688 kg
Curb weight
1895 kg
Trunk capacity
452 L
Trunk capacity
410 L
Length
4425 mm
Length
4460 mm
Width
1863 mm
Width
1845 mm
Height
1652 mm
Height
1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Max trunk capacity
1349 L
Payload
532 kg
Payload
375 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Power HP
272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.50 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Torque
323 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Power kW
200 kW
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Lynk & Co

Similar Comparisons

Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers petrol, hybrid and electric options plus proven practicality. Go for the EX40 if you want cutting‑edge EV efficiency and playful agility; pick the XC40 if you value versatility, a broader engine choice and tried‑and‑tested everyday usefulness.
Toyota Corolla Cross
Volvo XC40
VS
The Toyota Corolla Cross is the sensible, wallet-friendly compact SUV that delivers Toyota reliability, efficient engines and roomy practicality for everyday life, while the Volvo XC40 trades bargain-basement charm for premium materials, sharper handling and a cocoon of Scandinavian safety tech. If you want low running costs and uncomplicated usefulness, the Corolla Cross is your no-nonsense winner; if you prefer style, advanced driver aids and a badge that subtly screams “I care about safety (and design),” splurge on the XC40.
Volvo XC40
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Volvo XC40 stands out with its stylish Scandinavian design and commitment to safety, offering a serene driving experience complemented by a high-quality interior. On the other hand, the VW T-Roc impresses with its sportier dynamics and customizable features, appealing to drivers who prioritize a more engaging ride. Ultimately, the choice between the XC40 and T-Roc boils down to personal preferences in style, comfort, and driving experience.
CUPRA Terramar
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table, catering to different preferences in the increasingly popular market.
Kia Sportage
Volvo XC40
VS
When comparing the Kia Sportage to the Volvo XC40, the Sportage impresses with its value-driven approach, offering a generous array of standard features and a bold design. On the other hand, the Volvo XC40 excels in luxury and safety, with its upscale interior and advanced driver assistance technologies. Both models cater to distinct preferences, with the Sportage appealing to the budget-conscious and the XC40 attracting those seeking premium refinement.
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq and the Volvo XC40 go head-to-head in the compact SUV segment, each bringing unique advantages to potential buyers. The Karoq impresses with its practicality, offering generous cargo space and efficient engine options, making it an ideal choice for families and long journeys. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 stands out with its chic Scandinavian design and advanced safety features, appealing to buyers with a penchant for style and cutting-edge technology.
Kia EV3
Lynk & Co 02
VS
In the burgeoning market of electric vehicles, the Kia EV3 and Lynk & Co 02 offer compelling choices for eco-conscious consumers. The Kia EV3 impresses with its sleek design and commendable range, making it a practical option for those who prioritize efficiency without sacrificing style. Conversely, the Lynk & Co 02 stands out with its innovative subscription model and robust connectivity features, appealing to tech-savvy drivers looking for flexibility and modern convenience.
CUPRA Formentor
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a reputation for safety and comfort. Ultimately, the decision between these two distinctive models hinges on personal preferences for driving engagement versus everyday usability.
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC40?

The Volvo XC40 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.