Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Volvo XC40 vs Renault Arkana comparison
Compare performance (197 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC40 or Renault Arkana?
Volvo XC40 vs Renault Arkana: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
XC40
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Arkana is markedly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,305 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.8 L/100km.
Arkana
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 offers clearly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 3.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC40 delivers visibly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 95 Nm more.
XC40
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is slightly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,688 kg. The difference is around 178 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC40 carries moderately more – 532 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo XC40 comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,800
Volvo XC40
Volvo XC40
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Volvo XC40
The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.
details
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Volvo XC40
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,800 - 47,200 £
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
147 - 148 g/km
|
co2
106 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,688 kg
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
452 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,425 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,863 mm
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
|
Height
1,652 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,328 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
532 kg
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.