VS

Volvo XC60 vs Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster comparison

Compare performance (406 HP vs 1,050 HP), boot space and price (58,300 £ vs 420,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster?

Volvo XC60 vs Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster: Key differences

Volvo XC60

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
details

Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

  • clearly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Volvo XC60 is significantly cheaper – starting at 58,300 £ , while the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster costs 420,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 361,723 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 1.6 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster with 9.5 L/100km. The difference is about 7.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo XC60 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 79 km, about 58 km more than the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster.

849 Testarossa Roadster

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster offers clearly more power – delivering 1,050 HP compared to 406 HP. That’s roughly 644 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 2.3 s, while the Volvo XC60 takes 4.9 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

XC60

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Volvo XC60 offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster is a bit lighter – 1,860 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 290 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries substantially more – 510 kg compared to 220 kg. That’s a difference of about 290 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £58,300
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 335 - 406 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 79 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Comparing the Volvo XC60 and the Volvo EX60 pits a familiar midsize premium SUV against Volvo’s new all-electric contender: the XC60 offers refined petrol and hybrid options while the EX60 focuses on pure-electric range, sharper tech and lower running costs. If you’re choosing between established …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Volvo XC60
Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
Jakub
2 Jul 2026, 06:56:49

I own an XC60 2.4 D3 and I'm delighted. I suspect that later generations of the car are only better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

The Ferrari Testarossa Roadster strips the classic wedge-shaped drama down to open-top glamour, ensuring you arrive with presence and a grin. Behind the wheel it delivers a theatrical soundtrack and analogue charisma that will reward collectors and spirited drivers alike.

details
serpimg_Wp6wLc

Reviews Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC60 and the VW Tayron are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want a blend of style, practicality and advanced tech, but they offer distinctly different personalities. The XC60 leans toward Scandinavian refinement, safety and a comfortable ride, while the VW Tayron delivers a more …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 are two leading compact SUVs that serve similar needs but with distinct priorities: the RAV4 emphasizes value, reliability and fuel efficiency, while the XC60 leans toward premium comfort, advanced safety tech and a more refined driving experience. Choosing between …
Volvo XC60
Land Rover Discovery Sport
VS
The Volvo XC60 and the Land Rover Discovery Sport are two popular premium SUVs that appeal to buyers seeking a blend of comfort, safety and capability. The XC60 leans toward refined on-road manners and class-leading safety tech, while the Discovery Sport emphasizes off-road ability and flexible …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 comes down to practical reliability and value versus premium comfort and advanced safety tech. The CR-V is a roomy, efficient family SUV with low running costs, while the XC60 focuses on a refined interior, stronger safety credentials and a more …
Ferrari 12Cilindri Coupe
Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster
VS
Ferrari 12Cilindri Coupe and Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure …
Volvo XC60
Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

Costs and Consumption
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
Price
420,000 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
9.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
79 km
Electric Range
21 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
59 g/km
co2
216 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Roadster
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,150 kg
Curb weight
1,860 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
74 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,902 mm
Width
1,999 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
510 kg
Payload
220 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
Power HP
1,050 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
8
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
Power kW
772 kW
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
Engine capacity
3,990 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Ferrari
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.