VS

Volvo XC60 vs Ferrari Roma Convertible comparison

Compare performance (406 HP vs 620 HP), boot space and price (58,300 £ vs 207,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or Ferrari Roma Convertible?

Volvo XC60 vs Ferrari Roma Convertible: Key differences

Volvo XC60

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
details

Ferrari Roma Convertible

  • clearly more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC60

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Volvo XC60 is clearly cheaper – starting at 58,300 £ , while the Ferrari Roma Convertible costs 207,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 149,422 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 1.6 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ferrari Roma Convertible with 10.3 L/100km. The difference is about 8.7 L/100km.

Roma Convertible

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari Roma Convertible offers clearly more power – delivering 620 HP compared to 406 HP. That’s roughly 214 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari Roma Convertible is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.4 s, while the Volvo XC60 takes 4.9 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ferrari Roma Convertible delivers moderately more torque with 760 Nm compared to 669 Nm. That’s about 91 Nm more.

XC60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Volvo XC60 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Ferrari Roma Convertible is visibly lighter – 1,654 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 496 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £58,300
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 335 - 406 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 79 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Comparing the Volvo XC60 and the Volvo EX60 pits a familiar midsize premium SUV against Volvo’s new all-electric contender: the XC60 offers refined petrol and hybrid options while the EX60 focuses on pure-electric range, sharper tech and lower running costs. If you’re choosing between established …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Volvo XC60
Ferrari Roma Convertible

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
Jakub
2 Jul 2026, 06:56:49

I own an XC60 2.4 D3 and I'm delighted. I suspect that later generations of the car are only better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ferrari Roma Convertible

The Ferrari Roma Spider dresses the marque’s drama in a restrained, almost polite suit, folding its roof away to reveal a cabin that feels as civilized as it does intoxicating. Behind the wheel it serves grand touring manners with a playful shove and soundtrack, perfect for drivers who want thrilling Ferrari emotion without the daily fuss.

details
serpimg_XehzDq

Reviews Ferrari Roma Convertible

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC60 and the VW Tayron are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want a blend of style, practicality and advanced tech, but they offer distinctly different personalities. The XC60 leans toward Scandinavian refinement, safety and a comfortable ride, while the VW Tayron delivers a more …
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 are two leading compact SUVs that serve similar needs but with distinct priorities: the RAV4 emphasizes value, reliability and fuel efficiency, while the XC60 leans toward premium comfort, advanced safety tech and a more refined driving experience. Choosing between …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC60
VS
Comparing the Nissan Qashqai and the Volvo XC60 pits a practical, value-focused compact crossover against a more premium, comfort- and safety-oriented compact SUV. If you prioritize everyday efficiency and sensible running costs the Qashqai is a smart, budget-friendly choice, while the XC60 suits …
Mercedes GLB
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive compact luxury SUV segment, the Mercedes GLB stands out with its versatile seating layout and a seamless blend of style and functionality. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC60 impresses with its emphasis on safety and Scandinavian design aesthetics, offering a serene and high-tech driving …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of electrified luxury, the Audi Q6 e-tron stands out with its bold design and cutting-edge technology, appealing to those who prioritize performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Volvo XC60 offers a more classic Scandinavian approach, emphasizing safety and comfort alongside its …
Volvo XC60
Ferrari Roma Convertible

Costs and Consumption
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
Price
207,700 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
10.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
79 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
59 g/km
co2
234 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
80 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Convertible
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
2
Curb weight
2,150 kg
Curb weight
1,654 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
272 L
Length
-
Length
4,656 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Width
1,974 mm
Height
-
Height
1,306 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
510 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
Power HP
620 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
320 km/h
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
Torque
760 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
8
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
Power kW
456 kW
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
Engine capacity
3,855 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Ferrari
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.