Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Volvo XC60 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (455 HP vs 404 HP), boot space and price (49200 £ vs 61900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or Land Rover Range Rover Velar?
XC60
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Volvo XC60 has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 49200 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 61900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12694 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC60 manages with 2.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar with 4.80 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Volvo XC60 performs distinct better – achieving up to 82 km, about 19 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
Range Rover Velar
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a somewhat edge – offering 455 HP compared to 404 HP. That’s roughly 51 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar takes 5.40 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar performs distinct better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 70 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls minimal stronger with 709 Nm compared to 650 Nm. That’s about 59 Nm difference.
XC60
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Volvo XC60 is slight lighter – 1900 kg compared to 2003 kg. The difference is around 103 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers to a small extent more room – 552 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 69 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 performs a bit better – up to 1543 L, which is about 185 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Velar hardly perceptible takes the win – 587 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo XC60 sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Volvo XC60
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £49,200
Volvo XC60
Volvo XC60
5 (2 Reviews)
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
The Range Rover Velar marries sleek, pared-back styling with genuine off-road poise, so it looks at home in the city yet won’t flinch at rougher roads. Inside, a luxurious, tech-forward cabin pampers occupants while keeping the driving experience confidently in command — and yes, it somehow makes an SUV feel undeniably chic.
details
Volvo XC60
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49200 - 75100 £
|
Price
61900 - 87400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 10.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
|
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
co2
110 - 232 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
|
Curb weight
2003 - 2280 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
Trunk capacity
503 - 552 L
|
|
Length
4708 mm
|
Length
4797 mm
|
|
Width
1902 mm
|
Width
1933 mm
|
|
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
|
Height
1657 - 1665 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1335 - 1358 L
|
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Payload
460 - 587 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
209 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1997 - 2997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?
The Volvo XC60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.