VS

VW Polo vs Abarth 600 comparison

Compare performance (207 HP vs 280 HP), boot space and price (17,300 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW Polo or Abarth 600?

VW Polo vs Abarth 600: Key differences

VW Polo

4.1 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

Abarth 600

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Polo

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

VW Polo is significantly cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the Abarth 600 costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,733 £.

600

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Abarth 600 offers visibly more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 73 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Abarth 600 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the VW Polo takes 6.5 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Abarth 600 delivers barely more torque with 345 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.

Polo

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW Polo is considerably lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 1,700 kg. The difference is around 557 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Abarth 600 offers very slightly more boot space – 360 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 9 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW Polo carries considerably more – 457 kg compared to 225 kg. That’s a difference of about 232 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Polo holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,300
Polo

VW Polo

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 80 - 207 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

VW ID.3
VW Polo
VS
Comparing the ID.3 and the Polo pits Volkswagen's all-electric compact against its conventional small hatchback, highlighting a choice between emissions-free efficiency and traditional practicality. The ID.3 emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and a spacious cabin, while the Polo offers lower …
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
VW Polo
Abarth 600

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

VW Polo

The Polo is a well-built, comfortable hatchback that blends a refined cabin and composed manners into a compact package. It's easy to live with day to day, offering sensible space, tidy controls and reassuring quality that make it a practical choice for city or longer trips.

details
DB2021AU00726_medium
DB2021AU00728_medium
DB2021AU00732_medium
DB2021AU00735_medium
DB2021AU00736_medium
DB2021AU00741_medium

Reviews VW Polo

4.1 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Abarth 600

The sleek and stylish 600 has captured the hearts of both casual drivers and automotive enthusiasts alike. With its retro charm and modern features, this model seamlessly blends classic design with contemporary performance. Whether navigating city streets or embarking on a weekend adventure, the 600 offers a driving experience that is both fun and memorable.

details
serpimg_xnaB5r

Reviews Abarth 600

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
G
27 Apr 2026, 16:38:25

Both the Alpine A290 and Abarth 600e are fun cars - the first EVs to be properly engaging to drive. Despite the list price being significantly higher (but still below the critical £40k!), the Abarth is MUCH cheaper to lease... which makes the choice something of a no brainer in terms of value for money.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ee,E,,e
23 Nov 2025, 17:02:37

Djejejjeej

Frequently compared as well

VW Polo
VW Taigo
VS
The VW Polo is the sharp, no-nonsense hatchback that nails everyday practicality — nimble in town, economical to run and pleasantly composed on the motorway. The VW Taigo swaps a bit of luggage room and rear headroom for SUV flair, higher seating and a more eye-catching cabin, so pick the Polo for …
Toyota Yaris
VW Polo
VS
Choosing between the Toyota Yaris and the VW Polo comes down to whether you prioritise reliability and efficiency or a more refined drive and cabin quality. Both are compact, practical hatchbacks ideal for city life, but the Yaris leans toward excellent fuel economy and low running costs while the …
VW Polo
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Polo is a compact, city-friendly hatchback that prioritises fuel efficiency, easy parking and low running costs, while the VW T‑Roc is a small crossover offering a higher ride height, more interior space and greater practicality for families or those who need extra load-carrying versatility. …
VW Golf
VW Polo
VS
The latest comparison between the VW Golf and VW Polo reveals distinct differences that cater to varied driver preferences. The VW Golf, known for its spacious interior and advanced technology, is ideal for those seeking a comfortable and feature-rich driving experience. In contrast, the VW Polo …
Ford Puma
VW Polo
VS
Comparing the Ford Puma and the VW Polo comes down to choosing between a compact crossover that brings extra practicality and a semi-sporty feel (the Puma) and a traditional supermini that prioritizes refinement, build quality and precise handling (the VW Polo). Both are excellent everyday cars — …
Renault R5
VW Polo
VS
The Renault 5 (commonly called the R5) and the VW Polo are small hatchbacks aimed at city-focused buyers, but they take very different approaches—R5 leans into retro-styled electric chic while the Polo delivers proven practicality and conservative refinement. If you value modern EV character and …
Dacia Sandero
VW Polo
VS
The Dacia Sandero and VW Polo are compact hatchbacks that both aim to be practical, economical choices for city and small-family use, but they represent different philosophies: Sandero focuses on low cost and space, while the Polo emphasises refinement and polish. If your priority is the best …
Opel Corsa
VW Polo
VS
Opel Corsa and VW Polo go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
VW Polo
Abarth 600

Costs and Consumption
Price
17,300 - 30,800 £
Price
36,000 - 39,400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
344 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
116 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,378 kg
Curb weight
1,700 kg
Trunk capacity
351 L
Trunk capacity
360 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,751 mm
Width
1,779 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
432 - 457 kg
Payload
225 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
80 - 207 HP
Power HP
237 - 280 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 15.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 6.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
93 - 320 Nm
Torque
345 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
59 - 152 kW
Power kW
174 - 207 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
VW
Brand
Abarth
What drive types are available for the VW Polo?

The VW Polo is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.