VS

VW T-Cross vs Lynk & Co 01 comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 280 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 36,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Cross or Lynk & Co 01?

VW T-Cross vs Lynk & Co 01: Key differences

VW T-Cross

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • considerably lighter

Lynk & Co 01

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Cross

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW T-Cross is considerably cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Lynk & Co 01 costs 36,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,458 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Lynk & Co 01 uses 0.9 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 4.5 L/100km.

01

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 01 offers clearly more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 130 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 01 is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.7 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.4 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Lynk & Co 01 delivers significantly more torque with 535 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 285 Nm more.

T-Cross

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Cross is considerably lighter – 1,267 kg compared to 1,935 kg. The difference is around 668 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Lynk & Co 01 offers only slightly more boot space – 466 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 11 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Cross carries a bit more – 480 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 01 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,900
01

Lynk & Co 01

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 280 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 75 km
details

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
The SEAT Arona and VW T‑Cross duke it out in the small SUV ring: the Arona brings punchy styling and a driver-focused feel, while the T‑Cross leans on roomy practicality and Volkswagen calm. Pick the Arona for a bit more sparkle and sporty character, or the T‑Cross if cargo space, refinement and …
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
VW T-Cross
Lynk & Co 01

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

VW T-Cross

The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews VW T-Cross

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Monika
12 Feb 2026, 07:34:19

I chose the T‑Cross — more comfortable and roomier inside, especially for adult passengers; bought on the model‑year clearance — running costs work out cheaper even taking into account fuel savings from the Toyota hybrid (planned over five years); I like the space and the VW suited me better — I prefer the view through the front windshield.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Erasmo Paone
21 Oct 2025, 21:49:59

Very practical, interior space is excellent. Lacks charm, fuel consumption is a bit high.

Lynk & Co 01

The Lynk & Co 01 marries bold, contemporary styling with a roomy, well-appointed cabin, striking a rare balance between fashionable flair and everyday practicality. With intuitive tech, flexible ownership ideas and a playful driving character, it’s the kind of crossover that turns heads at the lights and keeps owners grinning on the commute.

details
381453-front_side_view-936758-original-1615303870
381443-side_view-fe0530-original-1615303770
381451-front_interior-54cae9-original-1615303868

Reviews Lynk & Co 01

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
Lee Burkitt
15 Mar 2026, 04:44:31

I have the 01 from 2022 and have had it for 2 years. It's been a lovely car to own and drive. I return from Spain to the UK twice a year in it and it's a pleasure to travel in. The only grip has been the infotainment system which has been buggy and slow. I had the software updated a few weeks ago at the Volvo garage as the over the air option does not work. This has made the infotainment system acceptable now.

It takes a while to get used to the seats for me as the base is quite hard but now I feel they are very confortable. I charge it everyday in the carpark and I use it 90% of the time on electric mode. It does the 70km on a full charge as stated and in petrol mode I'm getting around 16km a litre or 75 a gallon, the engine is only used on motorways.

Aftersales service is patchy here in Spain. My nearest dealer is about a 40 min drive from here, it's not like owning a Renault where there's a dealer everywhere, I've only had to take it there twice, once turned out to be a stone in a brake caliper causing a squeak and the other for the software update.

I highly recommend these cars!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
The verstegen
6 Jan 2026, 09:56:38

Top car.
Quality and price.
Great caravan tow vehicle.
A shame there's so much driving.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact crossover showdown, the Renault Captur dazzles with bold styling, quirky customization and clever interior tricks, while the VW T-Cross takes a quieter route—solid build, practical space and no-nonsense usability. Choose the Captur if you want personality and fun; pick the T‑Cross if …
VW T-Cross
VW Taigo
VS
Meet the VW T‑Cross and VW Taigo: two compact crossovers from Volkswagen chasing the same urban buyers but with very different personalities — the practical, upright T‑Cross versus the swoopy, style-first Taigo. Read on to see which one earns a place in your driveway, whether you prize family …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
The Ford Puma and VW T‑Cross go head-to-head in the compact crossover class — one flirty and fun, the other sensible and steady — both promising SUV looks without the bulk. We’ll pit the Puma’s lively handling and clever storage tricks against the T‑Cross’s comfort-first setup and family-friendly …
Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
The Toyota Yaris Cross sails ahead with brilliant hybrid economy, city-sized agility and Toyota’s trademark reliability, while the VW T‑Cross scores for sensible packaging, a bigger boot and a more grown-up driving feel. If you live in town and worship low fuel bills pick the Yaris Cross; if you …
Hyundai Kona
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive world of subcompact SUVs, the Hyundai Kona and VW T-Cross present a compelling showdown. The Hyundai Kona is celebrated for its bold design and sporty performance, while the VW T-Cross offers a more reserved elegance coupled with practical German engineering. Buyers seeking a …
Lynk & Co 01
Lynk & Co 08
VS
The Lynk & Co 01 and Lynk & Co 08 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
VW T-Cross
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the VW T-Cross and VW T-Roc showcase distinct personalities, catering to different preferences. The T-Cross excels in urban agility and practical, family-friendly features, while the T-Roc leans towards a sportier design and a more engaging driving experience. Both …
Suzuki Vitara
VW T-Cross
VS
In this showdown between the Suzuki Vitara and VW T-Cross, both compact SUVs offer distinct advantages for urban and adventurous drivers alike. The Vitara impresses with its robust off-road capabilities and generous interior space, while the T-Cross shines with its stylish design and advanced tech …
VW T-Cross
Lynk & Co 01

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
Price
36,900 - 40,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
75 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
124 - 136 g/km
co2
20 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
Curb weight
1,935 kg
Trunk capacity
455 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,784 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
463 - 480 kg
Payload
415 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Power HP
280 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Torque
535 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Power kW
206 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
VW
Brand
Lynk & Co
What drivetrain options does the VW T-Cross have?

The VW T-Cross is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.