Compare performance (150 HP vs 145 HP), boot space and price (26,400 £ vs 16,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Roc or Citroen C3 Aircross?
In the fiercely competitive compact SUV market, two prominent players have emerged as frontrunners: the Citroen C3 Aircross and the VW T-Roc. Both vehicles offer a blend of style, performance, and practicality, but which one edges out as the better choice? We dive deep into their technical aspects and innovations to help you decide.
The Citroen C3 Aircross stands out with its distinctive, upbeat design language. At a length of 4395 mm, width of 1795 mm, and a height of 1660 mm, it commands presence while ensuring ample interior space. On the other hand, the VW T-Roc offers a slightly more traditional SUV look with modern accents. Its dimensions vary slightly, with a length ranging from 4236 mm to 4271 mm and a slightly wider stance, adding a subtle edge in road presence and interior roominess.
The C3 Aircross provides versatility in its engine offerings with petrol, mild hybrids, and fully electric variants. The petrol models deliver between 101 and 136 HP with a manual or automatic dual-clutch transmission, ensuring efficient performance with consumption figures around 5.5 to 6.2 L/100km. Its electric variant offers an impressive range of up to 306 km, catering to the environmentally conscious driver.
The VW T-Roc offers a more diverse power spectrum in its line-up, from modest 115 HP engines to a thrilling 300 HP option for performance enthusiasts. Both petrol and diesel engines are available, with fuel consumption starting at 4.9 L/100km. The T-Roc can be equipped with either front-wheel or all-wheel drive, depending on the engine choice, offering greater flexibility for varying driving conditions.
Inside, the Citroen C3 Aircross boasts a spacious layout with a 5-seat configuration and a generous trunk capacity of 460 L, making it suitable for family trips and long journeys. The VW T-Roc also accommodates up to five passengers, though the trunk space maxes out at 445 L in its most spacious variant, slightly lagging behind the C3 Aircross.
Both SUVs come equipped with cutting-edge technology and features. The Citroen C3 Aircross shines with its advanced driver assistance systems and connectivity options, creating a user-friendly driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a slick infotainment system coupled with a host of digital tools to enhance driving safety and convenience.
The Citroen C3 Aircross offers commendable efficiency with its electric models achieving zero emissions and impressive consumption figures for its petrol variants. The T-Roc, though packed with powerful engine choices, maintains commendable efficiency, particularly its diesel engines, with CO2 emissions starting from 125 g/km.
The choice between the Citroen C3 Aircross and VW T-Roc ultimately depends on your priorities. The C3 Aircross appeals to those looking for innovative features, greener options, and cargo space. Conversely, the T-Roc might attract those desiring a wider range of power options, traditional handling, and all-wheel drive capabilities. Both SUVs bring a lot to the table, making this competition not just about performance, but also about which one aligns best with your lifestyle needs.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Citroen C3 Aircross is significantly cheaper – starting at 16,200 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,247 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C3 Aircross uses 5.3 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the VW T-Roc offers only slightly more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 145 HP. That’s roughly 5 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Roc is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Citroen C3 Aircross takes 12.3 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW T-Roc delivers only slightly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 230 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 Aircross is moderately lighter – 1,312 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 153 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Citroen C3 Aircross offers noticeably more boot space – 460 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 176 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries somewhat more – 515 kg compared to 462 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.
The Citroen C3 Aircross stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.
details
The Citroën C3 Aircross is a cheeky compact SUV that trades bland conformity for playful French character and clever practicality, ideal if you want a car with personality. It soaks up city life with a comfortable ride, inventive cabin tricks and a look that turns heads without asking for attention.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
|
Price
16,200 - 28,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.1 - 18.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
303 - 400 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
co2
0 - 134 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
|
Curb weight
1,312 - 1,608 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
284 L
|
Trunk capacity
460 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,395 mm
|
|
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,640 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,600 L
|
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Payload
407 - 462 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
101 - 145 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 13 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
143 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
125 - 230 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 107 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España