VS

VW Transporter Transporter vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (286 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (37,500 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW Transporter Transporter or Mazda CX-5?

VW Transporter Transporter vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

VW Transporter Transporter

  • substantially more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • somewhat lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Transporter Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-5 is visibly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the VW Transporter Transporter costs 37,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,524 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-5 uses 7 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the VW Transporter Transporter with 7.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Transporter Transporter offers substantially more power – delivering 286 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 145 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Transporter Transporter is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Transporter Transporter delivers considerably more torque with 415 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 177 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is somewhat lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,872 kg. The difference is around 243 kg.

When it comes to payload, the VW Transporter Transporter carries substantially more – 1,259 kg compared to 601 kg. That’s a difference of about 658 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Transporter Transporter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,500
Transporter Transporter

VW Transporter Transporter

  • Engine Type Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 110 - 286 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 7.1 - 8.4 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 21.9 - 24.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 56 - 331 km
VW Transporter Transporter
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

VW Transporter Transporter

The VW Transporter is the workhorse of the modern tradesman, blending practical cleverness with a cabin that's actually pleasant to spend a long day in. It may not steal the style spotlight, but its unshowy durability, clever load solutions and easy-to-live-with character make it a sensible pick for businesses and weekend projects alike.

details

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
VW Transporter Transporter
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption

Price
37,500 - 60,800 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
7.1 - 8.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
21.9 - 24.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
56 - 331 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
11.8 - 63.8 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 220 g/km
co2
157 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,872 - 2,462 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
5,050 - 5,450 mm
Length
-
Width
2,032 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
1,966 - 1,985 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
755 - 1,259 kg
Payload
566 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
110 - 286 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 16.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
112 - 150 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
310 - 415 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
81 - 210 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
VW
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.