@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Ford Puma vs Mazda CX-5 – Differences & prices compared

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Ford Puma?

Up to 168 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Ford Puma according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Ford Puma consumes 5.40 L.

Q: How much electricity does the Ford Puma use per 100 km?

According to the manufacturer, the Ford Puma requires 13.10 kWh.

Q: What is the Ford Puma’s maximum WLTP range?

The WLTP range is up to 376 km.

Q: What is the battery capacity of the Ford Puma?

The Ford Puma comes with a 43 kWh battery.

Q: What is the top speed of the Ford Puma?

The Ford Puma reaches up to 210 km/h.

Q: What are the Ford Puma’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Ford Puma is 4214 mm long, 1805 mm wide and 1555 mm high.

Q: What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-5 have?

The Mazda CX-5 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

Q: How powerful is the Mazda CX-5's engine?

Up to 141 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Ford Puma or Mazda CX-5?

scroll down

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

The Ford Puma versus Mazda CX-5: An In-Depth Comparison

In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, two contenders have carved out a niche for themselves: the Ford Puma and the Mazda CX-5. As both models present strong offerings for the 2024-2025 timeframe, discerning drivers must weigh their options carefully before choosing their next ride. From technical specifications to innovative features, we'll dive deep into what these models bring to the table.

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Performance and Powertrains

Both the Ford Puma and the Mazda CX-5 host a variety of engine options, catering to different driving needs. The Puma boasts a selection of petrol hybrid (MHEV) and electric variants, with power outputs ranging from 125 to 168 HP. The three-cylinder, 999 cm³ engine delivers a torque of up to 290 Nm, ensuring a responsive ride.

On the other hand, the CX-5 offers both petrol and diesel options, with power ranging from 150 to 194 HP. The four-cylinder engine variants provide a torque peak at 445 Nm, which is particularly impressive in the diesel configurations. While both models have manual and automatic transmissions, the Puma adds a dual-clutch automatic and reduction gearbox to its offerings.

scroll down

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Efficiency and Range

For those concerned with fuel efficiency and environmental impact, the Puma stands out with its electric variant offering an impressive range of up to 376 km and a battery capacity of 43 kWh. Fuel consumption for the petrol options is competitive, with figures between 5.4 and 6 L/100km.

The CX-5, while unable to match the full electric range, does present respectable fuel consumption figures from 5.6 to 7.6 L/100km. Its larger fuel tank capacity of 56-58 liters provides the advantage of longer travel distances without refueling.

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Interior Space and Practicality

Both SUVs offer seating for five, but differ slightly in cargo capacity. The Ford Puma provides a trunk capacity of up to 523 liters, making it a suitable choice for families and active individuals alike. Its compact dimensions, with a length of up to 4226 mm, are ideal for urban settings.

The Mazda CX-5, slightly larger at 4575 mm in length, offers up to 522 liters of trunk space. Its all-wheel-drive option adds versatility for those who might tackle varied terrains. The larger fuel tank and enhanced payload capacity also make it a practical option for longer road trips.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Technological Innovations

Looking at technological advancements, the Ford Puma shines with its hybrid technology. The inclusion of multiple driving modes further enhances energy efficiency, particularly in city driving conditions. Additionally, its dual-clutch automatic transmission promises smoother gear changes, translating to a more refined driving experience.

The CX-5 counters with Mazda's renowned Skyactiv technology, enhancing fuel efficiency and performance. The inclusion of modern infotainment systems, with features like a user-friendly interface and smartphone integration, keeps drivers and passengers connected and entertained on the go.

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Fit

Both the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-5 stand as strong choices in the competitive SUV market. The Puma, with its emphasis on hybrid and electric efficiency, caters to those prioritizing eco-friendly technology in a compact form. Meanwhile, the CX-5 offers a robust performance, especially in its diesel configurations, with larger dimensions catering to those requiring more space and power.

Ultimately, the choice between these two depends on one's specific needs: efficiency and compact design with the Puma, or space and power with the CX-5. Whichever option drivers lean towards, both models promise reliability, style, and modern innovation, making them worthy contenders in their class.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Puma has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30000 £. That’s a price difference of around 5229 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 1.60 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a slightly edge – offering 168 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 3.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Mazda CX-5 tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls to a small extent stronger with 290 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 52 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1629 kg. The difference is around 313 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers somewhat more room – 583 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 60 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs evident better – up to 2019 L, which is about 736 L more than the Ford Puma.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Ford Puma shows itself to be only a minor advantage and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £24,800

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

Price : 24800 - 36300 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail : Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Electric Range : 361 - 376 km
Battery Capacity : 43 kWh
Seats : 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 7.4 - 9.8 s
Model Year : 2025
Max Speed : 160 - 210 km/h
Torque : 170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders : 3
Doors : 5
Model : Puma
Modell : Puma Gen-E, Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid, Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid ST
CO2 Efficiency Class : A, D
Trim Level : Sound Edition, Premium, Titanium, Titanium PowerShift Automatik, ST-Line, ST-Line PowerShift Automatik, ST-Line X, ST-Line X PowerShift Automatik, Sound Edition PowerShift Automatik, PowerShift Automatik
Power kW : 92 - 124 kW
co2 : 0 - 135 g/km
Engine capacity : 999 cm3
Curb weight : 1316 - 1563 kg
Fuel tank capacity : 42 L
Trunk capacity : 456 - 523 L
Length : 4186 - 4226 mm
Width : 1805 mm
Height : 1550 - 1555 mm
Brand : Ford
Max trunk capacity : 1216 - 1283 L
Payload : 367 - 469 kg

details

Ford Puma

5 (1)

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Mazda CX-5

3 (1)

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW ID.3

If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

@ Renault Group Media

Renault R5

The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …

Ford Puma

Mazda CX-5

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center	@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price 24800 - 36300 £	Price 30000 - 39500 £
Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L	Consumption L/100km 7 - 7.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km 13.1 - 13.9 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 361 - 376 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 43 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 0 - 135 g/km	co2 157 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 42 L	Fuel tank capacity 56 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1316 - 1563 kg	Curb weight 1629 - 1671 kg
Trunk capacity 456 - 523 L	Trunk capacity 583 L
Length 4186 - 4226 mm	Length 4690 mm
Width 1805 mm	Width 1860 mm
Height 1550 - 1555 mm	Height 1695 mm
Max trunk capacity 1216 - 1283 L	Max trunk capacity 2019 L
Payload 367 - 469 kg	Payload -

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric, Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic, Manuel	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 125 - 168 HP	Power HP 141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.4 - 9.8 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed 160 - 210 km/h	Max Speed 195 km/h
Torque 170 - 290 Nm	Torque 238 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 92 - 124 kW	Power kW 104 kW
Engine capacity 999 cm3	Engine capacity 2488 cm3