VS

XPeng G9 vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (575 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (51,100 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – XPeng G9 or Mazda CX-6e?

XPeng G9 vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

XPeng G9

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • slightly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-6e

  • a bit cheaper
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

G9

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-6e is a bit cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the XPeng G9 costs 51,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,237 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the XPeng G9 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 18.4 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 0.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the XPeng G9 offers slightly more range – reaching up to 585 km, about 101 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G9 offers clearly more power – delivering 575 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 317 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G9 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng G9 delivers substantially more torque with 695 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 405 Nm more.

G9

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-6e is barely lighter – 2,205 kg compared to 2,210 kg. The difference is around 5 kg.

Looking at boot space, the XPeng G9 offers visibly more boot space – 660 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 192 L.

When it comes to payload, the XPeng G9 carries noticeably more – 520 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 135 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng G9 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,100
G9

XPeng G9

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 351 - 575 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.4 - 20.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 502 - 585 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.
XPeng G9
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

XPeng G9

The XPeng G9 feels like a confident leap into the electric SUV world, with sleek, purposeful styling and an interior that mixes modern tech with everyday comfort. On the road it’s calm and composed, serving up effortless pace and hushed refinement that turns long commutes into something you might actually enjoy — a strong pick for buyers who want electric convenience without compromise.

details
IMG_0235
IMG_0234
IMG_0233

Reviews XPeng G9

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Rob
1 Jan 2026, 18:43:08

I've seen and driven both cars. The XPeng 9 makes more of an impression. The Zeekr 7x's interior color is limited to black — a real shame! For a nicer contrast you'll have to have it wrapped in a different color. But that's a matter of taste! Otherwise the cars are comparable, noting that the XPeng is a proper SUV while the Zeekr 7x is a crossover.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
serpimg_tXFAQx

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

XPeng G6
XPeng G9
VS
The XPeng G6 is the nimble, value-packed option — a compact EV that squeezes impressive range and smart tech into a friendly price, ideal for buyers who want clever daily driving without flagship sticker shock. The XPeng G9, by contrast, is the full-size flagship: more power, longer range and a …
XPeng G9
ZEEKR 7X
VS
XPeng G9 arrives as a tech‑forward grand tourer — slick, serene and stuffed with autonomous driving toys and a luxurious, quietly sophisticated cabin; the ZEEKR 7X, by contrast, plays the sportier, more pragmatic card, delivering sharper handling, a brasher road presence and strong value for buyers …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Toyota bZ4X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Toyota bZ4X and Mazda CX-6e highlights two different takes on the electric crossover: Toyota’s practical, reliability-focused approach versus Mazda’s more premium, driver-oriented take. I’ll run through range and charging, interior and tech, driving dynamics, and running costs so you …
Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance …
XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
BYD Tang
XPeng G9
VS
The BYD Tang and XPeng G9 are two compelling contenders in the growing electric SUV market, each offering unique features and striking designs. The Tang impresses with its spacious interior and robust battery range, making it a practical choice for families on the go. Meanwhile, the G9 stands out …
XPeng G9
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
Price
51,100 - 62,200 £
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.4 - 20.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
502 - 585 km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,210 - 2,395 kg
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Trunk capacity
660 L
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,937 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
515 - 520 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
351 - 575 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
465 - 695 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
258 - 423 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
XPeng
Brand
Mazda
Is the XPeng G9 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.