Mazda CX-60 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mazda CX-60, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Mazda CX-60

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mazda CX-60 and are good next research steps.

from £42,800
CX-6e

Mazda CX-6e

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 468 - 484 km
details

Mazda CX-6e as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-60

Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term ownership.

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-6e

  • markedly more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
  • very slightly cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
Compare directly with Mazda CX-6e
from £30,000
CX-5

Mazda CX-5

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 141 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 7 - 7.5 L/100km
details

Mazda CX-5 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-60

Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while the CX-60 targets those who want extra refinement, performance and advanced tech.

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-5

  • significantly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately more trunk space
  • substantially cheaper
  • somewhat lighter
Compare directly with Mazda CX-5
from £31,300
Tucson

Hyundai Tucson

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 136 - 288 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.7 - 7.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 - 70 km
details

Hyundai Tucson as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-60

Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX‑60 both aim at buyers wanting a versatile SUV, but they take different paths: the Tucson prioritises practicality, efficiency and value, while the CX‑60 leans toward a more premium, refined driving experience with stronger performance. Choose the Tucson for space, tech and lower running costs; pick the CX‑60 if you want crisper handling, a quieter cabin and higher-end materials.

The Hyundai Tucson is a well-rounded compact SUV that blends modern styling with a comfortable, thoughtfully laid-out interior, making it appealing for daily driving and family use. It delivers a calm ride, a generous level of equipment for the price, and sensible practicality, so it's a smart choice if you want a straightforward, dependable crossover without fuss.

Quick data check: Hyundai Tucson

  • moderately more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • markedly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
Compare directly with Hyundai Tucson
from £46,000
NX

Lexus NX

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 292 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.9 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range 72 km
details

Quick data check: Lexus NX

  • barely cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space
  • markedly more efficient
  • slightly more electric range
  • marginally lighter
Compare directly with Lexus NX
from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
details

Mazda CX-80 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritize sportier, more refined handling and a compact footprint (CX-60) or passenger capacity and versatility with similar Mazda styling and quality (CX-80).

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-80

  • a bit cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • marginally more electric range
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
Compare directly with Mazda CX-80
from £37,700
RAV4

Toyota RAV4

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 185 - 309 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.3 - 5.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range 133 - 137 km
details

Toyota RAV4 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 feels like the small SUV that went to design school — rear-driven poise, a near-luxury cabin and punchy petrol or PHEV options that reward drivers who crave refinement and involvement. The Toyota RAV4, by contrast, is the stubbornly sensible choice: roomier, more practical, famously reliable and often cheaper to run in hybrid form, perfect if you want value and low fuss rather than flirting with feel-good handling.

The Toyota RAV4 is a well-rounded compact SUV that pairs everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed ride and generous cargo space, making it a sensible choice for families and active lifestyles. Its strong reputation for reliability, efficient drivetrains, and straightforward technology gives it wide appeal whether you value economy, comfort, or capability.

Quick data check: Toyota RAV4

  • very slightly more power
  • very slightly more trunk space
  • moderately cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • somewhat lighter
Compare directly with Toyota RAV4

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Mazda CX-60 head-to-head against similar models.

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-60
VS
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.