Mazda CX-60 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mazda CX-60, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

scroll down

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mazda CX-60 and are good next research steps.

from £30,000

Mazda CX-5

Price 30,000 - 39,500 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 141 HP
Consumption L/100km 7 - 7.5 L/100km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.5 - 10.9 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 238 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model CX-5
Modell CX-5 2.5 e-SKYACTIV-G 141
CO2 Efficiency Class F
Trim Level Prime-Line SKYACTIV-Drive, Center-Line SKYACTIV-Drive, Center-Line AWD SKYACTIV-Drive, Exclusive-Line SKYACTIV-Drive, Exclusive-Line AWD SKYACTIV-Drive, Homura SKYACTIV-Drive, Homura AWD SKYACTIV-Drive
Power kW 104 kW
co2 157 - 169 g/km
Engine capacity 2,488 cm3
Curb weight 1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity 466 L
Width 1,860 mm
Brand Mazda
Payload 566 - 601 kg

details

Mazda CX-5 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-60

Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while the CX-60 targets those who want extra refinement, performance and advanced tech.

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-5

significantly more power
clearly more efficient
clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
moderately more trunk space
substantially cheaper
somewhat lighter

Compare directly with Mazda CX-5

from £42,800

Mazda CX-6e

Price 42,800 - 45,400 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP 258 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range 468 - 484 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.9 s
Model Year 2026
Torque 290 Nm
Model CX-6e
Modell CX-6e
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Trim Level Takumi, Takumi Plus
Power kW 190 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 2,205 kg
Trunk capacity 468 L
Width 1,935 mm
Brand Mazda
Payload 385 kg

details

Mazda CX-6e as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-60

Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term ownership.

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-6e

markedly more power
noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
somewhat lighter
somewhat more trunk space
very slightly cheaper
significantly more electric range

Compare directly with Mazda CX-6e

from £51,700

BMW X3

Price 51,700 - 73,000 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 197 - 398 HP
Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 7.7 L/100km
Electric Range 88 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.6 - 7.8 s
Model Year 2,024 - 2,025
Torque 330 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 6
Model X3
Modell X3 20, X3 20d, X3 M50, X3 40d, X3 30e
CO2 Efficiency Class F, E, B
Trim Level xDrive Steptronic, M Sportpaket Pro xDrive Steptronic, M Sportpaket xDrive Steptronic
Power kW 145 - 293 kW
co2 64 - 175 g/km
Engine capacity 1,995 - 2,998 cm3
Curb weight 1,930 - 2,140 kg
Trunk capacity 460 - 570 L
Width 1,920 mm
Brand BMW
Payload 570 kg
Variant M Performance

details

BMW X3 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-60

The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 occupy the premium mid-size SUV segment but take different routes—the X3 prioritizes dynamic performance and upscale refinement, while the CX-60 leans toward refined comfort, efficiency and strong value. This comparison will help you decide which suits your priorities: driving engagement and brand prestige, or a well-rounded, tech-forward package at a more accessible price.

The BMW X3 blends sporty handling with premium comfort, making it a strong choice for drivers who want an engaging everyday SUV. Its well-appointed interior and confident road manners give it broad appeal for families and commuters who value style and versatility.

Quick data check: BMW X3

moderately cheaper
very slightly lighter
somewhat more power
visibly more efficient
markedly more electric range
markedly quicker 0–100 km/h

Compare directly with BMW X3

from £31,300

Hyundai Tucson

Price 31,300 - 48,800 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 136 - 288 HP
Consumption L/100km 2.7 - 7.6 L/100km
Electric Range 63 - 70 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.5 - 11.6 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 250 - 379 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model Tucson
Modell Tucson 1.6 T-GDI, Tucson 1.6 T-GDI HEV, Tucson 1.6 T-GDI PHEV, Tucson 1.6 CRDi 48V-Mildhybrid
CO2 Efficiency Class F, D, E, B
Trim Level Select, Select DCT, Trend DCT, N Line DCT, N Line X DCT, Prime DCT, N Line Allrad DCT, N Line X Allrad DCT, Prime Allrad DCT, Select Automatik, Trend Automatik, N Line Automatik, N Line Allrad Automatik, N Line X Automatik, N Line X Allrad Automatik, Prime Automatik, Prime Allrad Automatik
Power kW 100 - 212 kW
co2 62 - 172 g/km
Engine capacity 1,598 cm3
Curb weight 1,542 - 1,893 kg
Trunk capacity 546 - 620 L
Width 1,865 mm
Brand Hyundai
Payload 518 - 545 kg

details

Hyundai Tucson as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-60

Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX‑60 both aim at buyers wanting a versatile SUV, but they take different paths: the Tucson prioritises practicality, efficiency and value, while the CX‑60 leans toward a more premium, refined driving experience with stronger performance. Choose the Tucson for space, tech and lower running costs; pick the CX‑60 if you want crisper handling, a quieter cabin and higher-end materials.

The Hyundai Tucson is a well-rounded compact SUV that blends modern styling with a comfortable, thoughtfully laid-out interior, making it appealing for daily driving and family use. It delivers a calm ride, a generous level of equipment for the price, and sensible practicality, so it's a smart choice if you want a straightforward, dependable crossover without fuss.

Quick data check: Hyundai Tucson

moderately more power
clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
markedly cheaper
considerably more efficient
barely more electric range
markedly lighter
marginally more trunk space

Compare directly with Hyundai Tucson

from £34,200

Ford Kuga

Price 34,200 - 46,300 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 150 - 243 HP
Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Electric Range 68 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.3 - 9.9 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Model Kuga
Modell Kuga 1.5 EcoBoost, Kuga 2.5 FHEV, Kuga 2.5 PHEV, Kuga Active X 1.5 EcoBoost, Kuga Active X 2.5 FHEV, Kuga Active X 2.5 PHEV
CO2 Efficiency Class E, D, B
Trim Level Titanium, ST-Line, ST-Line X, Sound Edition, Titanium CVT, Titanium Allrad CVT, ST-Line CVT, ST-Line Allrad CVT, ST-Line X CVT, ST-Line X Allrad CVT, Sound Edition CVT, Sound Edition Allrad CVT, Titanium Automatik, ST-Line Automatik, ST-Line X Automatik, Sound Edition Automatik, CVT, Allrad CVT, Automatik
Power kW 111 - 178 kW
co2 55 - 154 g/km
Engine capacity 1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Curb weight 1,526 - 1,859 kg
Width 1,882 mm
Brand Ford
Payload 541 - 550 kg
Variant Active

details

Ford Kuga as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-60

The Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-60 take different approaches to the family SUV: the Kuga focuses on practicality, value and efficient powertrains, while the CX-60 aims for a more premium feel with stronger driving dynamics and a refined cabin. Choose the Kuga for everyday versatility and lower running costs; pick the CX-60 if you want a more composed ride, better materials and a more upscale driving experience.

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

Quick data check: Ford Kuga

noticeably more power
noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
clearly cheaper
markedly more efficient
only slightly more electric range
clearly lighter

Compare directly with Ford Kuga

from £33,600

VW Tiguan

Price 33,600 - 54,600 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 130 - 272 HP
Consumption L/100km 1.4 - 8.4 L/100km
Electric Range 118 - 126 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.9 - 10.2 s
Model Year 2,024 - 2,026
Torque 220 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model Tiguan
Modell Tiguan 1.5 eTSI, Tiguan 2.0 TSI OPF, Tiguan 2.0 TDI SCR, Tiguan 1.5 eHybrid OPF
CO2 Efficiency Class D, E, F, B, G
Trim Level Life DSG, ENERGY DSG, Elegance DSG, R-Line DSG, Life 4MOTION DSG, ENERGY 4MOTION DSG, Elegance 4MOTION DSG, R-Line 4MOTION DSG, Trend DSG, R-Line 195 4MOTION DSG
Power kW 96 - 200 kW
co2 32 - 190 g/km
Engine capacity 1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Curb weight 1,599 - 1,879 kg
Trunk capacity 490 - 652 L
Width 1,842 - 1,859 mm
Brand VW
Payload 499 - 556 kg

details

Quick data check: VW Tiguan

somewhat more power
only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
noticeably cheaper
significantly more efficient
significantly more electric range
somewhat lighter
a bit more trunk space

Compare directly with VW Tiguan

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Mazda CX-60 head-to-head against similar models.

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.