Mazda CX-60 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mazda CX-60, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

Mazda CX-60

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mazda CX-60 and are good next research steps.

from £42,800
CX-6e

Mazda CX-6e

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 468 - 484 km

Mazda CX-6e as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-60

Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term ownership.

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-6e

  • markedly more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
  • very slightly cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
from £30,000
CX-5

Mazda CX-5

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 141 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7 - 7.4 L/100km

Mazda CX-5 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-60

If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. Choose the CX-5 for savvy practicality and smiles-per-mile, pick the CX-60 if you’re ready to pay for extra presence, refinement and a little engineering show-off.

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-5

  • significantly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially cheaper
  • somewhat lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space
from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 60 km

Mazda CX-80 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-60

In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting families and those who value extra room for passengers or cargo. Both models share Mazda's renowned driving dynamics and sleek design language, offering buyers a choice between agility and spaciousness without compromising on quality or performance.

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-80

  • a bit cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • marginally more electric range
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
from £35,100
RAV4

Toyota RAV4

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 218 - 306 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 75 km

Toyota RAV4 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 feels like the small SUV that went to design school — rear-driven poise, a near-luxury cabin and punchy petrol or PHEV options that reward drivers who crave refinement and involvement. The Toyota RAV4, by contrast, is the stubbornly sensible choice: roomier, more practical, famously reliable and often cheaper to run in hybrid form, perfect if you want value and low fuss rather than flirting with feel-good handling.

The Toyota RAV4 is a pragmatic, family-friendly SUV that pairs impressively low running costs in hybrid form with a relaxed, motorway-friendly ride and a generous rear seat and boot that make everyday life easy. Its cabin leans toward practicality rather than polish—expect plenty of hard plastics and a tidy infotainment system that’s quick to respond but buries some climate functions in a touchscreen and can nag with drive‑recorder popups, so buyers wanting a premium feel or sporty dynamics should look elsewhere.

Quick data check: Toyota RAV4

  • very slightly more power
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • slightly more electric range
  • marginally lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
from £46,900
Sorento

Kia Sorento

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 194 - 252 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.9 - 7 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 55 km

Quick data check: Kia Sorento

  • marginally cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
from £49,200
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km

Volvo XC60 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-60

In a head-to-head comparison between the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC60, both vehicles offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. The CX-60 impresses with its dynamic handling and engaging driving experience, while the XC60 shines in terms of luxury and advanced safety features. Ultimately, choosing between these two well-rounded SUVs will depend on whether you prioritize sporty performance or a plush, tech-savvy ride.

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

Quick data check: Volvo XC60

  • moderately cheaper
  • barely lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
  • clearly more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.