Mazda CX-6e alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mazda CX-6e, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Mazda CX-6e

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mazda CX-6e and are good next research steps.

from £42,800
Sealion 7

BYD Sealion 7

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 313 - 530 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 19.9 - 21.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 456 - 502 km
details

BYD Sealion 7 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-6e

In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one will make your commute less boring and your wallet less unhappy.

The BYD Sealion 7 is a sleek electric wagon that blends sporty styling with surprising practicality, making it a compelling choice for drivers who want something different from the usual hatchback or SUV. Its refined interior and composed road manners give it an upscale feel, while clever packaging keeps it versatile for daily use.

Quick data check: BYD Sealion 7

  • only slightly more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
  • significantly more power
  • only slightly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space
Compare directly with BYD Sealion 7
from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 km
details

Mazda CX-60 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-6e

Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term ownership.

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-60

  • only slightly cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • markedly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
Compare directly with Mazda CX-60
from £45,400
7X

ZEEKR 7X

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 421 - 646 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 19.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 480 - 615 km
details

ZEEKR 7X as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-6e

Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.

The Zeekr 7X blends sleek, coupe-like styling with a roomy, premium cabin, giving it a confident presence on the road. It pairs refined handling with advanced tech and driver aids, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want electric performance without sacrificing comfort.

Quick data check: ZEEKR 7X

  • only slightly cheaper
  • marginally lighter
  • substantially more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
Compare directly with ZEEKR 7X
from £37,400
G6

XPeng G6

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 252 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.3 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 455 - 525 km
details

XPeng G6 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-6e

The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover — the G6 pushes a tech-forward, range-focused EV agenda while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s driver-focused dynamics to electrification. This comparison will cut through spec sheets to show how they differ in performance, range, technology, interior quality and overall value so you can pick the right car for your priorities.

The XPeng G6 is a sleek, tech-focused electric crossover that pairs modern styling with a spacious, comfortable cabin. It delivers a refined, engaging driving experience and comes loaded with advanced driver-assistance and infotainment features that make it feel like a smarter, more connected car.

Quick data check: XPeng G6

  • moderately cheaper
  • substantially more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
Compare directly with XPeng G6
from £30,000
CX-5

Mazda CX-5

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 141 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 7 - 7.5 L/100km
details

Mazda CX-5 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-6e

The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on the driveway.

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-5

  • clearly more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
Compare directly with Mazda CX-5
from £34,300
Model Y

Tesla Model Y

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 299 - 460 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.1 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 534 - 622 km
details

Tesla Model Y as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-6e

The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance and ecosystem against the CX-6e’s comfort, craftsmanship and everyday usability.

The Tesla Model Y is a compact electric SUV that pairs practical interior space with a minimalist, tech-forward cabin that feels modern and airy. Its confident electric performance and suite of driver-assist features make everyday driving effortless, and regular software updates help the car stay fresh over time.

Quick data check: Tesla Model Y

  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • visibly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
  • substantially more trunk space
Compare directly with Tesla Model Y

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Mazda CX-6e head-to-head against similar models.

BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.