Mercedes GLC EQ alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mercedes GLC EQ, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Mercedes GLC EQ

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mercedes GLC EQ and are good next research steps.

from £54,000
EX60

Volvo EX60

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 374 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 611 - 810 km
details

Volvo EX60 as a suitable alternative to Mercedes GLC EQ

Comparing the Volvo EX60 and the Mercedes GLC EQ pairs Volvo’s minimalist, safety-first electric SUV with Mercedes’ luxury-focused, tech-rich take on the midsize EV crossover. I'll highlight the key differences in driving dynamics, range, interior quality and running costs so you can choose the one that best fits your priorities.

The Volvo EX60 is a stylish electric SUV that pairs Scandinavian minimalism with a high-quality, comfortable cabin and an intuitive infotainment experience. It delivers a composed, refined ride with advanced safety and driver-assist systems that make daily driving relaxed and confident.

Quick data check: Volvo EX60

  • only slightly more trunk space
  • a bit cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • somewhat more electric range
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
Compare directly with Volvo EX60
from £58,000
C-Class EQ

Mercedes C-Class EQ

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 489 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.3 - 15.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 706 - 753 km
details

Mercedes C-Class EQ as a suitable alternative to Mercedes GLC EQ

Comparing the Mercedes C‑Class EQ and the Mercedes GLC EQ pits a sleek, electrically powered executive saloon against a compact electric SUV — two different takes on premium Mercedes electrification. This brief comparison will focus on their size, practicality, driving feel and tech so you can quickly see which suit your daily needs.

The Mercedes C‑Class EQ blends the familiar poise and luxury of the C‑Class with Mercedes' EQ electric ethos, delivering a quietly refined and modern driving experience. Inside, it pairs upscale materials and tech-forward touches with a composed ride that suits both city commuting and longer journeys.

Quick data check: Mercedes C-Class EQ

  • slightly more trunk space
  • marginally cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • marginally more electric range
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
Compare directly with Mercedes C-Class EQ
from £54,400
Q6 e-tron

Audi Q6 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 252 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 535 - 668 km
details

Audi Q6 e-tron as a suitable alternative to Mercedes GLC EQ

Comparing the Audi Q6 e-tron and the Mercedes GLC EQ pits two premium electric SUVs that blend luxury, technology and everyday practicality. If you're choosing between the Q6 e-tron and the GLC EQ, this comparison will walk through driving dynamics, range, interior comfort and value to help you pick the better fit for your needs.

The Audi Q6 e-tron combines Audi's premium design and refined interior with a modern electric drivetrain that delivers effortless, quiet acceleration. It feels spacious and tech-forward, making it a comfortable and confident choice for buyers who want an upscale electric SUV for daily driving and longer trips.

Quick data check: Audi Q6 e-tron

  • very slightly more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space
  • moderately cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • slightly lighter
Compare directly with Audi Q6 e-tron
from £51,100
G9

XPeng G9

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 351 - 575 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.4 - 20.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 502 - 585 km
details

Quick data check: XPeng G9

  • clearly more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • somewhat cheaper
  • somewhat more power
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
Compare directly with XPeng G9
from £34,300
Model Y

Tesla Model Y

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 299 - 460 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.1 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 534 - 622 km
details

Quick data check: Tesla Model Y

  • barely more power
  • somewhat more electric range
  • considerably cheaper
  • moderately more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
Compare directly with Tesla Model Y
from £71,600
EQE SUV

Mercedes EQE SUV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 265 - 625 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.3 - 23.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 453 - 611 km
details

Quick data check: Mercedes EQE SUV

  • moderately cheaper
  • markedly more efficient
  • somewhat more electric range
  • only slightly more trunk space
  • markedly more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
Compare directly with Mercedes EQE SUV

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Mercedes GLC EQ head-to-head against similar models.

Volvo EX60
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Mercedes C-Class EQ
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
XPeng G9
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Tesla Model Y
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Mercedes EQE SUV
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.