Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Abarth 500 595 695 vs Mazda CX-60 – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Abarth 500 595 695 or Mazda CX-60?
500 595 695
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Abarth 500 595 695 has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 32600 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 9343 £.
As for range, the Abarth 500 595 695 performs convincingly better – achieving up to 265 km, about 201 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a convincingly edge – offering 327 HP compared to 155 HP. That’s roughly 172 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Abarth 500 595 695 takes 7 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs distinct better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Abarth 500 595 695 tops out at 155 km/h. The difference is around 64 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls significantly stronger with 550 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 315 Nm difference.
500 595 695
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda CX-60 offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Abarth 500 595 695 is noticeable lighter – 1410 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 480 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers convincingly more room – 570 L compared to 185 L. That’s a difference of about 385 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs decisively better – up to 1726 L, which is about 1176 L more than the Abarth 500 595 695.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 evident takes the win – 612 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 227 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Mazda CX-60 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £41,900
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
Abarth 500 595 695
The Abarth 500, particularly in its 595 and 695 renditions, captures the spirit of Italian motoring with its compact yet aggressive design. Known for its lively performance and distinctive styling, this little powerhouse is a joy to drive, offering an engaging experience that appeals to enthusiasts. With its rich motorsport heritage, the Abarth 500 embodies the essence of fun and excitement on both the streets and the race track.
details
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Abarth 500 595 695
Mazda CX-60
|
@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32600 - 39400 £
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 18.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
242 - 265 km
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
37.80 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
3
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1410 - 1435 kg
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
185 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
3673 mm
|
Length
4745 mm
|
|
Width
1682 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
1518 mm
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
550 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
|
Payload
370 - 385 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
155 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
155 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
114 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Abarth
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Is the Abarth 500 595 695 offered with different drivetrains?
The Abarth 500 595 695 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.