@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Volvo XC40 – Which car suits you better?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Volvo XC40?

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, the compact SUV segment continues to grow in popularity, leading automotive enthusiasts to compare standout contenders like the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC40. Both vehicles boast contemporary design, innovative technology, and driving comfort, but they approach the market with distinct philosophies. In this article, we will closely examine the technical aspects, innovations, and overall performance of these two vehicles to help you make an informed choice.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Performance and Engine Options

The Mazda CX-60 comes with a choice of powertrains that cater to a variety of preferences. It offers a plug-in hybrid with 327 HP and a diesel mild-hybrid engine that generates power levels of 200 HP and 254 HP, supported by an automatic gearbox. This versatility means drivers can select between impressive electric range and fuel efficiency, with consumption levels peaking at just 1.4 L/100km for the plug-in hybrid variant.

In contrast, the Volvo XC40 is powered by petrol mild-hybrid engines producing either 163 HP or 197 HP. While the XC40's performance is commendable, it doesn’t match the higher output offered by the Mazda CX-60. With a slightly higher consumption rate of approximately 6.5 L/100km, the XC40 positions itself towards traditional fuel efficiency rather than plug-in electric capability.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Driving Experience and Handling

The Mazda CX-60 surprises many with its driving dynamics, featuring options for both all-wheel drive and rear-wheel drive systems. The CX-60 achieves a quick 0-100 km/h sprint in just 5.8 seconds when equipped with the most powerful engine. The SUV’s stability and handling emphasize a sporty character often associated with Mazda vehicles, promising an engaging driving experience.

On the other hand, the Volvo XC40, with a front-wheel drive layout, takes a more understated approach to handling. With a 0-100 km/h time of 8.6 seconds for its base model, the XC40 is no slouch but offers a more comfort-oriented experience compared to the CX-60’s sportiness. The XC40 excels in city maneuverability thanks to its compact dimensions, and while it may not be the fastest in acceleration, it feels planted and secure on the road.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Dimensions and Practicality

When it comes to size, the Mazda CX-60 stretches to a length of 4745 mm, making it significantly longer than the Volvo XC40, which measures 4425 mm. This contributes to a greater trunk capacity of 570 liters in the CX-60 versus the XC40's 452 liters, offering more room for luggage and cargo.

Both SUVs comfortably seat five passengers, but the Mazda CX-60 has a slightly taller cabin and is rated to carry up to 612 kg of payload compared to the XC40’s 532 kg. This additional space and capacity make the Mazda a more appealing choice for families or those requiring extra storage.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Innovations and Technology

Both the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo XC40 are equipped with an array of technological innovations aimed at enhancing the driving experience. The CX-60 offers a sophisticated infotainment system with seamless smartphone integration, advanced driver assistance features, and an intuitive head-up display that improves driving safety. Mazda’s commitment to driver engagement is evident in its interior design, which prioritizes ergonomics and an uncluttered layout.

Volvo, on the other hand, integrates its well-known safety features into the XC40, including the latest advanced driver assistance systems, adaptive cruise control, and automatic emergency braking. Volvo’s infotainment system prides itself on a clean, minimalist design with a robust set of features, although some users may find it a bit less intuitive compared to Mazda’s setup.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Conclusion: Choosing Your SUV

The decision between the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC40 ultimately comes down to personal preferences and priorities. If you seek performance, versatility in power options, and a roomier interior, the Mazda CX-60 shines as a remarkable contender. However, if safety features, comfort, and a premium feel matter more to you, then the Volvo XC40 sets the benchmark for those criteria.

Ultimately, both SUVs exemplify quality in the compact SUV category, proudly representing the expertise of their respective brands. Regardless of your choice, a test drive of both vehicles is essential to appreciate their unique offerings fully.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Volvo XC40 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 5143 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 5.10 L per 100 km.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a evident edge – offering 327 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 130 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs slightly better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls significantly stronger with 550 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is somewhat lighter – 1688 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 202 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly perceptible more room – 570 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 118 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs noticeable better – up to 1726 L, which is about 398 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 a bit takes the win – 612 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 80 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-60 proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £41,900
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.4 - 5.4 L
  • Electric Range : 64 km
details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Volvo XC40

5 (2)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Mazda CX-60
Volvo XC40
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Lexus LBX and Volvo XC40 stand out with their distinctive styles and premium features. The LBX impresses with its sleek design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers, while the XC40 offers a robust driving experience and top-notch …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.