VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Volvo XC40 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (327 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (43700 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Volvo XC40?

Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Volvo XC40

5 (4 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Volvo XC40 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6909 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 3.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 2.70 L per 100 km.

XC40

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a evident edge – offering 327 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 130 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls significantly stronger with 550 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.

Ad · Affiliate
Car accessories
Car accessories
Popular best-sellers for everyday use & care
View on Amazon →
Boot organiser
Boot organiser
Storage boxes, nets & anti-slip solutions
Open best-sellers →
Car dash cams
Car dash cams
Safety, parking mode & 4K recording
See top models →
Car phone holders
Car phone holders
MagSafe, vent mounts & dashboard mounts
Browse popular mounts →
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is somewhat lighter – 1688 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 202 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly perceptible more room – 570 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 118 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 a bit takes the win – 612 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 80 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mazda CX-60
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.8 - 5.2 L
  • Electric Range : 63 km
details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Volvo XC40

5 (4 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl

Reviews Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (4 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Volvo XC40
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
Mazda CX-60
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
43700 - 57900 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
-
Length
4425 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
-
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
CUPRA Terramar
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both …
Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
In the burgeoning compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Toyota RAV4 stand out with their distinct blends of style and utility. While the CX-60 offers a more upscale interior and sporty driving dynamics, the RAV4 excels in practicality and fuel efficiency, making it a top choice for families. …
Lexus LBX
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Lexus LBX and Volvo XC40 stand out with their distinctive styles and premium features. The LBX impresses with its sleek design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers, while the XC40 offers a robust driving experience and top-notch …
Peugeot 3008
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Peugeot 3008 and Volvo XC40 stand out for their distinctive designs and advanced technology. The 3008 impresses with its stylish interior and engaging driving dynamics, while the XC40 offers a robust blend of safety features and premium materials. Both …
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.