VS

Alfa Romeo Giulia vs Volvo XC40 comparison

Compare performance (520 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (48,000 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Giulia or Volvo XC40?

Alfa Romeo Giulia vs Volvo XC40: Key differences

Alfa Romeo Giulia

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
details

Volvo XC40

5 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Giulia

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Volvo XC40 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 41,900 £ , while the Alfa Romeo Giulia costs 48,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,095 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Alfa Romeo Giulia uses 5.4 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

XC40

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Giulia offers considerably more power – delivering 520 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 323 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Giulia is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alfa Romeo Giulia delivers considerably more torque with 600 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.

Giulia

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Alfa Romeo Giulia is only slightly lighter – 1,640 kg compared to 1,688 kg. The difference is around 48 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Alfa Romeo Giulia carries marginally more – 535 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 3 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alfa Romeo Giulia stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,000
Giulia

Alfa Romeo Giulia

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 210 - 520 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 10.1 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Alfa Romeo Giulia
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alfa Romeo Giulia

The Alfa Romeo Giulia captivates with its stunning Italian design and dynamic performance, representing a perfect blend of elegance and sportiness. Its engaging driving experience, characterised by precise handling and responsive steering, appeals to enthusiasts who crave the thrill of the road. Inside, the Giulia showcases a beautifully crafted interior that combines luxury with cutting-edge technology, making every journey a delight.

details
fca_germany_alfa_romeo_giulia_quadrifoglio_my2020_173-5ed608edc95c9
fca_germany_alfa_romeo_giulia_quadrifoglio_my2020_222-5ed60a3d4d877
fca_germany_alfa_romeo_giulia_quadrifoglio_my2020_127-5ed60851062af
giuliastelvioquadrifogliomy2023-5eb2ca0bb242d_5eb3d66ae7e99
fca_germany_alfa_romeo_giulia_quadrifoglio_my2020_063-5ed6059fd7bec

Reviews Alfa Romeo Giulia

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo XC40

The Volvo XC40 blends Scandinavian design with practical versatility, offering a compact luxury crossover that feels composed and easy to live with. It’s refined and focused on safety with a high-quality interior, making it a smart choice for daily city driving and weekend escapes.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (6 Reviews)
rate
Trentini Paolo
7 May 2026, 13:45:44

Delivered a few days ago — a radical change after 5 VW Golfs, most recently a T‑Roc.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
S. M.
20 Apr 2026, 09:07:56

Excellent

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
Volvo XC40
VS
The Hyundai Tucson turns heads with bold styling, generous kit and wallet-friendly practicality, while the Volvo XC40 answers with crisp Scandinavian design, a cosseting cabin and a premium badge that justifies the extra euros. If you want bang-for-buck family usability and lots of equipment go …
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Volvo XC40 put two sides of Volvo’s compact-SUV line-up head-to-head: the EX40 is a dedicated electric model focused on efficiency, range and modern tech, while the XC40 is a versatile compact SUV available with petrol, hybrid and electric options that delivers a more traditional …
Volvo EC40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo C40 and Volvo XC40 are closely related compact Volvos that deliver strong safety, premium interiors and modern tech, but they take different routes: the C40 is a coupe‑styled, electric‑first model focused on design and emission‑free driving, while the XC40 is a more conventional SUV …
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
Lexus NX
Volvo XC40
VS
The Lexus NX and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact luxury SUVs that blend premium craftsmanship with everyday practicality. The NX leans toward refined comfort and dependable hybrid tech, while the XC40 emphasizes clean Scandinavian design, clever packaging and class-leading safety—so choice …
BYD Seal U
Volvo XC40
VS
The BYD Seal U and the Volvo XC40 represent two different approaches to modern motoring: the Seal U is an electric fastback emphasizing range, technology and value, while the XC40 is a compact premium SUV known for safety, comfort and refinement. This comparison highlights their key strengths and …
Toyota C-HR
Volvo XC40
VS
The Toyota C-HR and Volvo XC40 are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want small-car maneuverability with SUV practicality, but they take different routes: the C-HR focuses on bold styling and efficiency while the XC40 leans toward comfort, safety and a more premium feel. This comparison will help …
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC40
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the sensible all-rounder — roomy, reliable and economical, with a no-nonsense cabin that shrugs off daily abuse and keeps going long after the dealer coffee runs out. The Volvo XC40 swaps some of that Toyota practicality for chic Scandinavian flair, sharper safety tech and a …
Alfa Romeo Giulia
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,000 - 88,300 £
Price
41,900 - 46,100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
141 - 229 g/km
co2
148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,640 - 1,735 kg
Curb weight
1,688 kg
Trunk capacity
480 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 - 1,874 mm
Width
1,863 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
415 - 535 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
210 - 520 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
470 - 600 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
154 - 382 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
2,143 - 2,891 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Alfa Romeo
Brand
Volvo
Is the Alfa Romeo Giulia offered with different drivetrains?

The Alfa Romeo Giulia is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.