Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Alfa Romeo Junior vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison
Compare performance (280 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (26,100 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Junior or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
Alfa Romeo Junior vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Junior
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Alfa Romeo Junior is clearly cheaper – starting at 26,100 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,328 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Alfa Romeo Junior is a bit more efficient: consuming 15.1 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 2.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers visibly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 190 km more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
Mustang Mach-E
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers substantially more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 280 HP. That’s roughly 207 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Alfa Romeo Junior takes 5.9 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers considerably more torque with 950 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 605 Nm more.
Junior
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is considerably lighter – 1,380 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 781 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers visibly more boot space – 519 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries marginally more – 450 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Alfa Romeo Junior
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Alfa Romeo Junior
The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Alfa Romeo Junior
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26,100 - 41,600 £
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 119 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,689 kg
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,781 mm
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
390 - 420 kg
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
107 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.