VS

Alfa Romeo Tonale vs Skoda Kodiaq – Which model is better for everyday use?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Tonale or Skoda Kodiaq?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tonale @ media.stellantis.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Alfa Romeo Tonale has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 35000 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 1877 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Alfa Romeo Tonale with 1.30 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs convincingly better – achieving up to 123 km, about 61 km more than the Alfa Romeo Tonale.

Kodiaq @ skoda-media.de

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Tonale has a slight edge – offering 280 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Tonale is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 6.20 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs minimal better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Alfa Romeo Tonale tops out at 212 km/h. The difference is around 19 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls to a small extent stronger with 400 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.

Tonale @ media.stellantis.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alfa Romeo Tonale is minimal lighter – 1600 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 84 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers convincingly more room – 910 L compared to 500 L. That’s a difference of about 410 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinct better – up to 2105 L, which is about 555 L more than the Alfa Romeo Tonale.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq slight takes the win – 545 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £36,800
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.4 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 113 - 123 km
details

Alfa Romeo Tonale

The Alfa Romeo Tonale embodies the brand's timeless elegance and sporty DNA, captivating drivers with its bold design and dynamic presence on the road. Inside, the Tonale impresses with a perfect blend of luxury and cutting-edge technology, offering a sophisticated driving experience that remains true to the Alfa Romeo spirit. With its agile performance and distinctive character, the Tonale stands out in the competitive SUV market, appealing to those who seek both style and substance.

details
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_017-62cea8da1df0f @ media.stellantis.com
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_014-62cea9188c509 @ media.stellantis.com
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_011-62cea94b3aab6 @ media.stellantis.com
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_015-62cea900a8b76 @ media.stellantis.com
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_020-62cea1ddc130d @ media.stellantis.com
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_021-62cea1cc66ba6 @ media.stellantis.com

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)
rate

The Škoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and sleek design, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. Equipped with a range of modern features, it offers a comfortable driving experience and outstanding versatility. Its robust build and refined handling make it suitable for both urban settings and countryside escapades.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_45646 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984 @ skoda-media.de

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the sensible grown-up: roomy, cleverly packaged and quietly refined for family life, while the Dacia Bigster bangs the value drum — massive interior and tough price tag, but fewer niceties. Choose the Kodiaq for long-term polish and smarter detailing; pick the Bigster if you …
Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
Alfa Romeo Tonale
Skoda Kodiaq
Tonale
Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
35000 - 53200 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
1.3 - 5.6 L
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
62 km
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
12 kWh
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
30 - 140 g/km
co2
9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1600 - 1910 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
385 - 500 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
4528 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
1835 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1614 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1430 - 1550 L
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Payload
510 - 535 kg
Payload
460 - 545 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 - 280 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.2 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
194 - 212 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
240 - 320 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
96 - 206 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1332 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
Brand
Alfa Romeo
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty design and performance-focused features, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a thrilling driving experience. In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq offers a more practical approach, emphasizing spaciousness and versatility …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, both models showcase exceptional versatility but cater to slightly different audiences. The Kodiaq, with its bold SUV design and spacious three-row seating, is perfect for families and adventure seekers, while the Touran offers a …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their blend of practicality and style. The CR-V impresses with its reliability and spacious interior, making it a family favorite, while the Kodiaq offers a touch of European flair and a versatile seven-seat …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing …
Renault Rafale
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the battle of practicality and performance, the Renault Rafale takes on the Skoda Kodiaq, showcasing distinct strengths in the competitive SUV market. While the Rafale impresses with its sleek design and advanced tech features, the Kodiaq stands out for its spacious interior and versatile …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
In the realm of family SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC90 stand as formidable contenders. The Skoda Kodiaq entices with its impressive practicality, value for money, and versatile seven-seat configuration, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious families. On the other hand, the Volvo …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Alfa Romeo Tonale
VS
In the battle of modern Italian engineering, the Alfa Romeo Junior takes on the Alfa Romeo Tonale, showcasing distinct personalities within Alfa's lineup. The Junior dazzles with its classic style and sporty dynamics, appealing to purists and enthusiasts alike, while the Tonale offers a more …
What drivetrain options does the Alfa Romeo Tonale have?

The Alfa Romeo Tonale is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.