Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Audi Q4 e-tron – Differences & prices compared
Two cars, one duel: Alpine A290 meets Audi Q4 e-tron.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Alpine A290 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 39600 £. That’s a price difference of around 6386 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s slight more efficient than the Audi Q4 e-tron with 15.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.10 kWh.
As for range, the Audi Q4 e-tron performs distinct better – achieving up to 554 km, about 174 km more than the Alpine A290.
Q4 e-tron
@ Audi AG
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron has a distinct edge – offering 340 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Audi Q4 e-tron performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q4 e-tron pulls significantly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 379 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is distinct lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2035 kg. The difference is around 556 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers distinct more room – 535 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 209 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Audi Q4 e-tron performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1490 L, which is about 384 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Audi Q4 e-tron minimal takes the win – 515 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Audi Q4 e-tron shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £39,600
@ Audi AG
Audi Q4 e-tron
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Audi Q4 e-tron
The Audi Q4 e-tron seamlessly combines sustainable driving with premium comfort, embodying the brand's commitment to electric mobility. Its sleek design and spacious interior create an inviting atmosphere, perfect for those who appreciate both style and practicality. With a focus on innovative technology, the Q4 e-tron offers a dynamic driving experience that appeals to modern drivers seeking eco-friendly alternatives.
details
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
Alpine A290
Audi Q4 e-tron
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Audi AG
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
39600 - 58800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.4 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
406 - 554 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
2035 - 2235 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
520 - 535 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4588 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1865 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1614 - 1632 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1460 - 1490 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
505 - 515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Audi
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.