VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs CUPRA Tavascan comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or CUPRA Tavascan?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs CUPRA Tavascan: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • barely more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
details

CUPRA Tavascan

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron VS CUPRA Tavascan — quick editorial overview

Audi Q4 e-tron VS CUPRA Tavascan pits Audi’s calm, family-friendly electric SUV against Cupra’s more design-forward, coupé‑style EV. The Audi Q4 e-tron presents itself as a quietly reassuring everyday car: roomy in the rear, familiar in its controls and tuned for relaxed motorway miles. The CUPRA Tavascan answers with sharper looks, a more theatrical interior and a chassis that feels livelier without being extreme. Choosing between them is a choice between measured comfort and expressive style, with practical trade‑offs around headroom, charging convenience and how the cabin actually feels day to day.

Tavascan

Driving character and on-road behavior

The Audi Q4 e-tron drives like a seasoned cruiser: composed, predictable and forgiving, which makes it effortless on long stretches and easy to place in traffic. The CUPRA Tavascan leans toward a more engaged feel with quicker steering and a firmer edge when you option its dynamic suspension, so it rewards someone who notices and enjoys sharper turn‑in. That livelier Tavascan edge comes with compromises — the coupé roof and heavier wheels can make the ride less forgiving over pitted surfaces — whereas the Q4 masks road irregularities better. If you prefer a relaxed, grown‑up character pick the Q4 e-tron; if you want more feel and flair behind the wheel, the Tavascan is the more expressive choice.

Q4 e-tron

Comfort and long-distance usability

On long trips the Audi Q4 e-tron stands out for its low cabin noise and a seating posture that favours endurance, so days at motorway speeds feel less tiring. The CUPRA Tavascan is also quiet and efficient on steady runs, but its coupé silhouette and optional large wheels reduce headroom and can make longer stints slightly more taxing for tall passengers. The Q4’s climate controls and user-facing layout are easier to operate without distraction, while the Tavascan’s modern display and DCC suspension offer tailored comfort settings if you like to switch between soft and firm. For fewer, shorter charging interruptions the Q4’s charging behavior is an advantage; the Tavascan rewards economical driving but expects you to accept longer recharge stops.

Tavascan

Interior feel, controls and perceived quality

The Audi Q4 e-tron delivers a familiar Audi ambience — tidy ergonomics and useful physical controls — but closer inspection reveals hard plastics in secondary areas that temper the perceived luxury. The CUPRA Tavascan intentionally feels more dramatic inside: bold styling, different textures and a strong center presentation that gives it a more upmarket first impression. That said, the Tavascan’s haptic sliders and touch‑first controls can be fussy in daily use, while the Q4’s deeper menu structures and capacitive steering buttons cause occasional frustration. In short, the Q4 feels reliably premium in operation; the Tavascan sells style first and you should check material choices and switch ergonomics to see if they match your expectations.

Q4 e-tron

Practicality, space and family usability

For families the Audi Q4 e-tron is slightly easier to live with: a flat rear floor, generous knee room and straightforward access for child seats make the back row genuinely practical. The CUPRA Tavascan surprises with a very usable boot and smart loadfloor options, but the coupé roofline dents rear headroom and rear visibility, which matters with booster seats or taller occupants. Both avoid a front luggage bay, so expect to manage charging cables under the cargo floor; the Q4’s layout can make that awkward when fully laden. If everyday family practicality and easy rear accommodation are priorities, lean Q4; if you prize a tidy boot and can live with slightly less rear headroom, the Tavascan still works well.

Tavascan

Who should choose each car — buyer fit and trade-offs

Buy the Audi Q4 e-tron if you prioritise calm motorway manners, rear‑seat comfort and an intuitive, conservative cabin that makes daily life simple; it suits commuters and families who want predictable costs and fuss‑free ergonomics. Opt for the CUPRA Tavascan if styling, a sportier presentation and a more engaging dashboard are central to your decision, and you accept the coupé compromises on rear headroom and slower rapid‑charge convenience. Both cars serve as competent electric SUVs, but the decision comes down to whether you want measured, Audi‑style refinement or a bolder, design‑led package with a livelier chassis — the technical comparison that follows will help you match those tendencies to the exact spec you’re considering.

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
CUPRA Tavascan
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Cupra Tavascan is Cupra’s all-electric crossover, offering sleek styling and EV-focused tech, while the Cupra Terramar targets buyers who prefer a compact, performance-oriented SUV with a conventional powertrain. This comparison cuts through driving character, practicality, equipment and …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Audi Q4 e-tron is very slightly cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the CUPRA Tavascan costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,057 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is barely more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 15.4 kWh/100km for the CUPRA Tavascan. That’s a difference of about 0.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 35 km more than the CUPRA Tavascan.

Tavascan

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

Both models deliver identical power – 340 HP each.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the CUPRA Tavascan takes 5.5 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers somewhat more torque with 679 Nm compared to 545 Nm. That’s about 134 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is very slightly lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,096 kg. The difference is around 61 kg.

Looking at boot space, the CUPRA Tavascan offers only slightly more boot space – 540 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 5 L.

When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Tavascan carries barely more – 518 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 3 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 440 - 592 km
details
Audi Q4 e-tron
CUPRA Tavascan

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

CUPRA Tavascan

The Cupra Tavascan blends athletic styling with a premium, driver-focused cabin, giving the electric crossover a distinctly sporty character. It feels poised and engaging on the road while standing out with bold design cues and a modern, high-quality finish.

details
89C3E534-A830-42FA-86CC-BA89F47CCA5A
E1499BC5-9624-4D31-A93B-93D1887B3824
2C084747-FC5E-41F7-84AE-11FE7F54C046

Reviews CUPRA Tavascan

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
David
25 Apr 2026, 10:57:49

Both are very good. The range and energy consumption is beter in the cupra. The cupra is also more responsive and it handles beter. The Kia is more spacious and slightly beter tech wise. The Kia is more a family car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Kia EV3
VS
This comparison puts the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Kia EV3 head-to-head, contrasting Audi’s premium, tech-rich compact electric SUV with Kia’s practical, value-driven EV. Read on to see how they match up on range, comfort, features and running costs so you can choose the right electric car for your …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
CUPRA Tavascan
VW ID.4
VS
The Cupra Tavascan and the VW ID.4 are closely related electric SUVs that take different approaches: the Tavascan leans into sharper styling and a sportier driving character, while the ID.4 prioritises practicality, comfort and broad everyday appeal. If you want dynamic design and a more engaging …
CUPRA Tavascan
CUPRA Raval
VS
Choosing between the CUPRA Tavascan and the CUPRA Raval means weighing two different takes on style, technology and driving character from the same performance-focused brand. This comparison will cover driving dynamics, range and charging, interior practicality, and overall value so you can pick …
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Tavascan
VS
The CUPRA Formentor and Tavascan take different approaches to sporty, premium compact SUVs: the Formentor mixes sharp handling with combustion and hybrid powertrains, while the Tavascan is CUPRA’s fully electric, design‑forward coupe‑SUV. This quick comparison will help you choose between the …
CUPRA Tavascan
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan and Mazda CX-6e offer distinct approaches to the electric crossover: the Tavascan leans into sporty performance and bold styling, while the CX-6e prioritizes Mazda’s refined design and everyday usability. This comparison focuses on driving dynamics, range and practicality to help …
Audi Q4 e-tron
CUPRA Tavascan

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
42,800 - 50,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 17.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
441 - 557 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
2,096 - 2,273 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
540 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,861 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
507 - 518 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
350 - 545 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
CUPRA
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.