Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs BMW iX3 – Which car suits you better?
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Alpine A290 or BMW iX3?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Alpine A290 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the BMW iX3 costs 59100 £. That’s a price difference of around 25886 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the BMW iX3: with 15.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s barely noticeable more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.70 kWh.
As for range, the BMW iX3 performs significantly better – achieving up to 805 km, about 425 km more than the Alpine A290.
iX3
@ BMW Group Press
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW iX3 has a significantly edge – offering 469 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 251 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW iX3 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the BMW iX3 performs slightly better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BMW iX3 pulls decisively stronger with 645 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 345 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is clearly lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2360 kg. The difference is around 881 kg.
In terms of boot space, the BMW iX3 offers evident more room – 520 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 194 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BMW iX3 performs noticeable better – up to 1750 L, which is about 644 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 slight takes the win – 471 kg compared to 465 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the BMW iX3 shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £59,100
@ BMW Group Press
BMW iX3
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
BMW iX3
The BMW iX3 is an all-electric SUV that combines elegant design with sustainable technology, showcasing the brand's commitment to a greener future. Its refined interior offers a high level of comfort and advanced connectivity features, making it an attractive option for tech-savvy drivers. With its dynamic performance, the iX3 provides an engaging driving experience, proving that environmentally conscious solutions don't have to compromise on driving pleasure.
details
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
Alpine A290
BMW iX3
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ BMW Group Press
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
59100 - 64600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.10 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
805 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
108.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
2360 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
520 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4782 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1895 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1635 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1750 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
465 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
469 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.90 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
645 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
345 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
BMW
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.