Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs BYD Seal U – Which car suits you better?
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Alpine A290 or BYD Seal U?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Alpine A290 has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the BYD Seal U costs 34300 £. That’s a price difference of around 1106 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s evident more efficient than the BYD Seal U with 19.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 4.10 kWh.
As for range, the BYD Seal U performs noticeable better – achieving up to 500 km, about 120 km more than the Alpine A290.
Seal U
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Seal U has a noticeable edge – offering 324 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 106 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Seal U is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 5.90 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the BYD Seal U performs minimal better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BYD Seal U pulls decisively stronger with 550 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is noticeable lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1940 kg. The difference is around 461 kg.
In terms of boot space, the BYD Seal U offers decisively more room – 552 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 226 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BYD Seal U performs evident better – up to 1465 L, which is about 359 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 to a small extent takes the win – 471 kg compared to 410 kg. That’s a difference of about 61 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the BYD Seal U shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £34,300
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
BYD Seal U
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
BYD Seal U
The BYD Seal U presents itself as a sophisticated addition to the electric vehicle market, blending sleek design with cutting-edge technology. Its modern aesthetic is complemented by a spacious interior, offering both comfort and functionality for drivers and passengers alike. With advanced features prioritising sustainability and performance, it represents a bold step forward in eco-friendly motoring.
details
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
Alpine A290
BYD Seal U
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
34300 - 39800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 1.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.9 - 20.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
70 - 500 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 26 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1940 - 2147 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
425 - 552 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4775 - 4785 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1668 - 1670 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1440 - 1465 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
410 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
218 - 324 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
160 - 238 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1497 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
BYD
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.