Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Ford Kuga – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Two cars, one duel: Alpine A290 meets Ford Kuga.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Alpine A290 has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Ford Kuga costs 34200 £. That’s a price difference of around 1071 £.
As for range, the Alpine A290 performs convincingly better – achieving up to 380 km, about 312 km more than the Ford Kuga.
Kuga
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga has a to a small extent edge – offering 243 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 25 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Kuga performs a bit better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Alpine A290 pulls a bit stronger with 300 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is slight lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1526 kg. The difference is around 47 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Kuga offers clearly perceptible more room – 412 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 86 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Kuga performs noticeable better – up to 1534 L, which is about 428 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Ford Kuga somewhat takes the win – 550 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 79 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Alpine A290 proves to be has the upper hand and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Alpine A290 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £33,200
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Ford Kuga
The Ford Kuga stands out in the realm of compact SUVs with its sleek design and dynamic performance capabilities. Its spacious interior is thoughtfully designed to provide comfort and practicality for both driver and passengers, making it an ideal choice for families and adventurers alike. Advanced technology and safety features further enhance the driving experience, ensuring a seamless blend of innovation and reliability on the road.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Alpine A290
Ford Kuga
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
34200 - 46300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
412 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4604 - 4645 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1882 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1673 - 1681 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1534 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
195 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1496 - 2488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Ford
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.