VS

Alpine A290 vs Honda CR-V comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (33,200 £ vs 40,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Honda CR-V?

Alpine A290 vs Honda CR-V: Key differences

Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
details

Honda CR-V

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Alpine A290 is markedly cheaper – starting at 33,200 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 40,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,029 £.

As for electric range, the Alpine A290 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 380 km, about 302 km more than the Honda CR-V.

CR-V

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 offers a bit more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda CR-V delivers somewhat more torque with 335 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Alpine A290 is moderately lighter – 1,554 kg compared to 1,821 kg. The difference is around 267 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers substantially more boot space – 617 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 291 L.

When it comes to payload, the Honda CR-V carries a bit more – 475 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 79 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A290 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,200
A290

Alpine A290

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 177 - 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 364 - 380 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Alpine A290
Renault R5
VS
The Alpine A290 is the sharpened, slightly posher take on the same small‑car bones — think keener handling, a firmer chassis and a price that winks “premium.” The Renault 5, by contrast, is the cheeky everyday charmer: more affordable, practical and easygoing, so if you want smiles without a second …
Honda CR-V
Honda ZR-V
VS
The Honda CR-V and Honda ZR-V are close relatives but aim at different buyers: the CR-V emphasizes roomy comfort and family-friendly practicality, while the ZR-V focuses on a more compact, engaging package for urban and active drivers. This comparison will run through size, driving character, fuel …
Alpine A290
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alpine A290

The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.

details
alpinea290

Reviews Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Emin Molu
17 Apr 2026, 21:05:51

excellent handling, excellent damping, excellent noise supression, excellent design.fantastic fun to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
42223_CR-V_2015
42220_CR-V_2015
42219_CR-V_2015
42241_CR-V_2015

Reviews Honda CR-V

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
Henk van der Werf
1 Jun 2026, 20:15:51

The fuel economy you report in your test is, of course, nonsense. This is a plug-in, and so you're being fooled. Of course a CR‑V isn't more economical than an HR‑V. Think!

Roger
23 May 2026, 22:21:51

My 2026 CR‑V hybrid has had no problems. It’s quieter than my previous 2019 RAV4 hybrid. The exterior finish feels more solid across the whole vehicle. It’s less affected by crosswinds. I prefer the CR‑V’s driving. Its only drawback is that it uses just a little more fuel than the RAV4.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marek
19 May 2026, 07:08:56

Very comfortable, lots of space, combined fuel consumption about 6 l, reliable, simple to operate, without unnecessary gadgets, very well made, easy to drive, a car for the city and long trips.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Yvi
18 Mar 2026, 18:55:49

Good car, very comfortable. It still drinks petrol — I do a lot of driving, so the hybrid system only makes itself felt in traffic jams....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Honda CR-V
Lexus NX
VS
The Honda CR-V and Lexus NX are two of the most sensible compact crossovers on the market—one prized for roomy practicality and strong value, the other for luxury, refinement and a more premium driving experience. This comparison shows how the CR-V’s efficient, user-friendly package stacks up …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
Alpine A290
CUPRA Born
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born go toe-to-toe as compact electric hatchbacks, each prioritising sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. This comparison looks at performance, range, interior quality and everyday practicality to help you decide which better fits your needs.
Ford Kuga
Honda CR-V
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Ford Kuga stands out with its sporty design and agile handling, offering a dynamic driving experience that appeals to enthusiasts. In contrast, the Honda CR-V impresses with its reputation for reliability and spacious interior, making it a family-friendly …
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-60 each bring distinctive strengths to the table. The Honda CR-V continues to be a crowd favorite with its spacious interior, impressive fuel efficiency, and strong reliability ratings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out …
Honda CR-V
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Honda CR-V and Toyota Yaris Cross go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Honda CR-V or the …
Honda CR-V
Kia Sportage
VS
Honda CR-V and Kia Sportage go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Honda CR-V or the Kia …
Honda CR-V
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Honda CR-V and Nissan Qashqai go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Honda CR-V or the Nissan …
Alpine A290
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,200 - 39,600 £
Price
40,200 - 48,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
78 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
59 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,554 kg
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,820 mm
Width
1,866 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
396 kg
Payload
439 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
335 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
135 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Honda
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

The Alpine A290 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.