@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
VS

Alpine A290 vs Lynk & Co 02 – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Alpine A290 or Lynk & Co 02?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Lynk & Co 02 has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30900 £, while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £. That’s a price difference of around 2319 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Lynk & Co 02 with 17.10 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.30 kWh.

As for range, the Lynk & Co 02 performs a bit better – achieving up to 445 km, about 65 km more than the Alpine A290.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 02 has a slightly edge – offering 272 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 02 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 5.50 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Lynk & Co 02 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Lynk & Co 02 pulls barely noticeable stronger with 323 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 23 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is noticeable lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1895 kg. The difference is around 416 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Lynk & Co 02 offers clearly perceptible more room – 410 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 84 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Lynk & Co 02 performs slightly better – up to 1349 L, which is about 243 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 clearly perceptible takes the win – 471 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 96 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Lynk & Co 02 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Lynk & Co 02 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £30,900
default

Lynk & Co 02

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.1 - 17.6 kWh
  • Electric Range : 435 - 445 km
details

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details
alpinea290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Lynk & Co 02

The car 02 has captured the hearts of enthusiasts with its iconic design and engaging driving dynamics. Known for its lightweight build, it delivers a spirited performance that makes every twist and turn exhilarating. With its classic styling and a cabin that balances retro charm with modern comfort, the car 02 remains a true icon in the automotive world.

details

Top Car Comparisons

ZEEKR X
Lynk & Co 02
VS
The ZEEKR X and Lynk & Co 02 present a compelling comparison in the electric SUV segment, each appealing to distinct consumer preferences. While the ZEEKR X boasts a sleek design and cutting-edge technology, the Lynk & Co 02 emphasizes versatility with its unique subscription model and …
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
In the exciting showdown between the Alpine A290 and the iconic Renault R5, enthusiasts are treated to a fascinating blend of modern engineering and classic charm. The A290 boasts cutting-edge performance and advanced technology, while the R5 captivates with its nostalgic allure and timeless …
Alpine A290
Lynk & Co 02
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
30900 - 34300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
1895 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
410 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
4460 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1845 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
1349 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
375 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
-
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.50 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
323 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
200 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Lynk & Co

Similar Comparisons

@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Born
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Kia Corporation
Kia EV3
Lynk & Co 02
VS
In the burgeoning market of electric vehicles, the Kia EV3 and Lynk & Co 02 offer compelling choices for eco-conscious consumers. The Kia EV3 impresses with its sleek design and commendable range, making it a practical option for those who prioritize efficiency without sacrificing style. …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX30
Lynk & Co 02
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Lynk & Co 02 offer compelling options in the compact crossover market, each bringing unique attributes to discerning drivers. The Volvo EX30 emphasizes Scandinavian elegance and cutting-edge safety features, while the Lynk & Co 02 boasts striking design and connectivity-focused …
Lynk & Co 02
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
BYD Sealion 7
VS
The Lynk & Co 02 and BYD Sealion 7 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG4
Lynk & Co 02
VS
The MG MG4 and Lynk & Co 02 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
@ Audi AG
Audi A3 Sportback
VS
Alpine A290 and Audi A3 Sportback go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
BYD Atto 3
Lynk & Co 02
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the BYD Atto 3 and the Lynk & Co 02 showcase distinct advantages catering to diverse segments of electric vehicle enthusiasts. The BYD Atto 3 impresses with its advanced battery technology and a spacious interior that promises comfort for family drives. Meanwhile, the …
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX30
VS
In the thrilling matchup between the Alpine A290 and the Volvo EX30, driving enthusiasts will appreciate the Alpine A290 for its nimble handling and spirited performance, embodying the classic French flair in a compact hatchback form. On the other hand, the Volvo EX30 stands out with its …
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.