@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Alpine A290 vs Mazda CX-60 – Differences & prices compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Mazda CX-60?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Alpine A290 has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 8734 £.

As for range, the Alpine A290 performs convincingly better – achieving up to 380 km, about 316 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a distinct edge – offering 327 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 109 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs noticeable better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 49 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls convincingly stronger with 550 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is distinct lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 411 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers convincingly more room – 570 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 244 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs distinct better – up to 1726 L, which is about 620 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 noticeable takes the win – 612 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 141 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-60 shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £41,900
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.4 - 5.4 L
  • Electric Range : 64 km

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.

details
Alpine A290
Mazda CX-60
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption

Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
64 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
31 - 139 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
4745 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Mazda
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.