Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Peugeot 208 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (218 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (33200 £ vs 20700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Peugeot 208?
A290
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Peugeot 208 has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20700 £ , while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12489 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Peugeot 208: with 14.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.70 kWh.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 208 performs somewhat better – achieving up to 432 km, about 52 km more than the Alpine A290.
208
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 has a evident edge – offering 218 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Peugeot 208 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Peugeot 208 performs somewhat better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Alpine A290 pulls minimal stronger with 300 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Peugeot 208 is noticeable lighter – 1165 kg compared to 1554 kg. The difference is around 389 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Peugeot 208 offers slight more room – 352 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 26 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Peugeot 208 performs minimal better – up to 1163 L, which is about 57 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Peugeot 208 minimal takes the win – 430 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 34 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Peugeot 208 leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Alpine A290
Peugeot 208
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £20,700
Peugeot 208
Alpine A290
5 (1 Reviews)
The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.
details
Peugeot 208
3 (1 Reviews)
The Peugeot 208 feels like a city-savvy fox: compact, stylish and surprisingly grown-up, with a cabin that punches above its weight and enough personality to make daily commutes a little less boring. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want chic practicality without the showroom bluster — easy to park, thrifty to run and oddly fun when the road tightens up.
details
Alpine A290
Peugeot 208
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
20700 - 35200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 5.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 15.4 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
362 - 432 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
46 - 51 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 117 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1554 kg
|
Curb weight
1165 - 1530 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
309 - 352 L
|
|
Length
3990 mm
|
Length
4055 mm
|
|
Width
1820 mm
|
Width
1745 mm
|
|
Height
1520 mm
|
Height
1430 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1118 - 1163 L
|
|
Payload
396 kg
|
Payload
380 - 430 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
150 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, C
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.