Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Tesla Model Y – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Alpine A290 or Tesla Model Y?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Alpine A290 has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Tesla Model Y costs 38600 £. That’s a price difference of around 5391 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Tesla Model Y: with 13.90 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.90 kWh.
As for range, the Tesla Model Y performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 622 km, about 242 km more than the Alpine A290.
Model Y
@ Tesla, Inc.
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model Y has a clearly edge – offering 627 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 409 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model Y is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.50 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 2.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Tesla Model Y performs noticeable better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 80 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Tesla Model Y pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 493 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 193 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is noticeable lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1976 kg. The difference is around 497 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model Y offers convincingly more room – 822 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 496 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Tesla Model Y performs clearly better – up to 2022 L, which is about 916 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Tesla Model Y hardly perceptible takes the win – 472 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Tesla Model Y proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Tesla Model Y is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £38,600
@ Tesla, Inc.
Tesla Model Y
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Tesla Model Y
The Tesla Model Y stands out in the electric vehicle market with its sleek design and impressive range. Its interior is minimalist yet stylish, offering a spacious cabin that enhances the driving experience. The Model Y also features advanced technology, including an intuitive infotainment system, making it a leader in innovative motoring.
details
@ Tesla, Inc.
@ Tesla, Inc.
@ Tesla, Inc.
@ Tesla, Inc.
Alpine A290
Tesla Model Y
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Tesla, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
38600 - 53100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.9 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
500 - 622 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
64.5 - 85 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1976 - 2108 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
822 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4790 - 4796 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1921 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1611 - 1624 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2022 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
418 - 472 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
299 - 627 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 5.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
201 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 493 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
220 - 461 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Tesla
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.