Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Tesla Model Y - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (218 HP vs 627 HP), boot space and price (33200 £ vs 34300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Tesla Model Y?
A290
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Alpine A290 has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £ , while the Tesla Model Y costs 34300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1106 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Tesla Model Y: with 12.70 kWh per 100 km, it’s clearly perceptible more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.10 kWh.
As for electric range, the Tesla Model Y performs convincingly better – achieving up to 657 km, about 277 km more than the Alpine A290.
Model Y
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model Y has a clearly edge – offering 627 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 409 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model Y is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.50 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 2.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Tesla Model Y performs noticeable better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 80 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Tesla Model Y pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 493 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 193 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is noticeable lighter – 1554 kg compared to 1953 kg. The difference is around 399 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model Y offers convincingly more room – 822 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 496 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Tesla Model Y performs clearly better – up to 2138 L, which is about 1032 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Tesla Model Y slightly takes the win – 472 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 76 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Tesla Model Y is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Alpine A290
Tesla Model Y
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £34,300
Tesla Model Y
Alpine A290
5 (1 Reviews)
The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.
details
Tesla Model Y
4.5 (4 Reviews)
The Tesla Model Y blends SUV practicality with sports-car poke, wrapping a roomy, minimalist cabin and handy hatch into a slick, aerodynamic package that feels more Silicon Valley gadget than garage ornament. It’s an ideal pick for buyers who want effortless electric driving, regular software improvements and access to Tesla’s convenient charging network, though style-conscious shoppers should know it’s more about tech and efficiency than classic luxury.
details
Alpine A290
Tesla Model Y
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
34300 - 53100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
12.7 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
534 - 657 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
64.5 - 85 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1554 kg
|
Curb weight
1953 - 2108 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
822 L
|
|
Length
3990 mm
|
Length
4790 - 4797 mm
|
|
Width
1820 mm
|
Width
1921 mm
|
|
Height
1520 mm
|
Height
1611 - 1624 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2022 - 2138 L
|
|
Payload
396 kg
|
Payload
440 - 472 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
299 - 627 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 7.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
201 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 493 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
220 - 461 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Tesla
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.