VS

Audi A1 vs Mazda CX-30 – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Audi A1 or Mazda CX-30 fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi A1 has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 19700 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 5563 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi A1 manages with 5.20 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A1 has a slightly edge – offering 207 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 21 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A1 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 6.50 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi A1 performs a bit better – reaching 245 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 41 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi A1 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 320 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Audi A1 is evident lighter – 1175 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 280 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers distinct more room – 430 L compared to 335 L. That’s a difference of about 95 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs evident better – up to 1406 L, which is about 316 L more than the Audi A1.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 minimal takes the win – 496 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Audi A1 shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £19,700
A186760_medium

Audi A1

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 207 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.2 - 6.4 L
details

Audi A1

The Audi A1 captivates with its sleek design and compact dimensions, making it an ideal choice for urban driving. Inside, it boasts a premium interior that reflects Audi's commitment to quality and attention to detail. With a spirited performance and advanced technology, the A1 delivers an engaging driving experience that appeals to both young and discerning drivers alike.

details
A186760_medium @ audi-mediacenter.com
A186764_medium @ audi-mediacenter.com
A186752_medium @ audi-mediacenter.com
A186753_medium @ audi-mediacenter.com
A186756_medium @ audi-mediacenter.com
A186776_medium @ audi-mediacenter.com

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer interior; choose the Kamiq for everyday practicality, brilliant space use and better value for families and commuters.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Audi A1
Mazda CX-30
A1
CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
19700 - 28300 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.4 L
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
118 - 146 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1175 - 1365 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
335 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
4029 - 4046 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1740 - 1756 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1409 - 1459 mm
Height
1540 mm
Max trunk capacity
1090 L
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Payload
410 - 470 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 207 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 11.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
182 - 245 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Torque
175 - 320 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
70 - 152 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Audi A1
Fiat 500
VS
In the competitive realm of compact cars, the Audi A1 and Fiat 500 each bring their own charm to the table. While the Audi A1 stands out with its premium features and advanced technology, the Fiat 500 captivates with its iconic design and urban agility. Ultimately, the choice between these two stylish contenders will depend on whether you prioritize luxury or an expressive personality in your daily drive.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, appealing to drivers who prioritize unique styling and urban maneuverability. Both models deliver on fuel efficiency and compact versatility, but the choice ultimately hinges on whether you value Mazda's craftsmanship or Nissan's quirky charm.
Mazda CX-30
Vauxhall Mokka
VS
Audi A1
MINI Countryman
VS
Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, making them strong contenders for buyers seeking style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.
What drive types are available for the Audi A1?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.