VS

Audi A3 Sportback vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (400 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 49,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A3 Sportback or Volvo XC60?

Audi A3 Sportback vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Audi A3 Sportback

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • substantially more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter
details

Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A3 Sportback

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Audi A3 Sportback is considerably cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,191 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A3 Sportback uses 1.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Volvo XC60 with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi A3 Sportback offers substantially more range – reaching up to 141 km, about 59 km more than the Volvo XC60.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers a bit more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 400 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A3 Sportback is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Volvo XC60 takes 4.9 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Audi A3 Sportback is markedly faster – reaching 237 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 57 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers noticeably more torque with 709 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 209 Nm more.

A3 Sportback

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi A3 Sportback is markedly lighter – 1,360 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 540 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers noticeably more boot space – 483 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 103 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 offers noticeably more capacity – up to 1,543 L, about 443 L more than the Audi A3 Sportback.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries slightly more – 550 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A3 Sportback is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
A3 Sportback

Audi A3 Sportback

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 400 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 134 - 141 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …
Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Meet the Volvo XC60 and the new Volvo EX60 — two mid‑size premium SUVs that look like cousins but drive like rivals, one rooted in combustion tradition and the other staking Volvo’s claim in the electric future. Which should you buy: the familiar, comfort-first XC60 that does everything reliably …
Audi A3 Sportback
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi A3 Sportback

The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.

details
A202267_overfull
A202258_overfull
A202235_overfull
A202271_overfull
A201906_overfull
A202227_overfull

Reviews Audi A3 Sportback

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design and a strong emphasis on safety features, making it a top choice for families and safety-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, appealing …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
In the highly competitive midsize SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Volvo XC60 stand out for their distinctive approaches to style and performance. While the Kuga excels with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the XC60 offers a luxurious cabin and a refined driving experience. …
Mercedes GLC
Volvo XC60
VS
When it comes to luxury compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 both offer a blend of performance, style, and cutting-edge technology. The Mercedes GLC stands out with its elegant interior and advanced infotainment system, perfect for those who value luxury and connectivity. Alternatively, …
Volvo XC60
Dacia Bigster
VS
In a comparison between the Volvo XC60 and the Dacia Bigster, each SUV brings distinct offerings to the table. The Volvo XC60 impresses with its Scandinavian design, premium materials, and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for those who prioritize luxury and technology. Meanwhile, …
Audi A3 Sportback
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
27,000 - 56,600 £
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
25 - 211 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,360 - 1,685 kg
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
4,352 - 4,353 mm
Length
4,708 mm
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
1,441 - 1,470 mm
Height
1,655 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,100 L
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
Payload
410 - 480 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
225 - 237 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the Audi A3 Sportback?

The Audi A3 Sportback is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.