VS

Audi A6 e-tron Avant vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (551 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (55,200 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 e-tron Avant or Mazda CX-80?

Audi A6 e-tron Avant vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Audi A6 e-tron Avant

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • very slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A6 e-tron Avant

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-80 is slightly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Audi A6 e-tron Avant costs 55,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,914 £.

As for electric range, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers clearly more range – reaching up to 716 km, about 656 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers considerably more power – delivering 551 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 224 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A6 e-tron Avant delivers markedly more torque with 855 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 305 Nm more.

A6 e-tron Avant

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is very slightly lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,185 kg. The difference is around 54 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers considerably more boot space – 502 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 244 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries noticeably more – 650 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 150 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A6 e-tron Avant is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £55,200
A6 e-tron Avant

Audi A6 e-tron Avant

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 326 - 551 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 17 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 539 - 716 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant and the Audi Q6 e-tron bring electric power to two distinct Audi philosophies: the Avant offers a low, aerodynamic touring wagon focused on efficiency and luggage capacity, while the Q6 e-tron is a higher-riding SUV that emphasizes space, visibility and everyday …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi A6 e-tron Avant

The Audi A6 e-tron Avant wraps Audi's trademark refinement into a sleek electric estate that looks at home in the city or on the open road. Inside it's grown-up and tech-forward with practical packaging for family life, delivering a composed, confident drive that makes everyday hauling feel a bit more special and slightly futuristic.

details
A243176_medium
A243167_medium
A243148_medium

Reviews Audi A6 e-tron Avant

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Audi Q8 e-tron
VS
In a compelling clash of Audi electric vehicles, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant and Audi Q8 e-tron deliver distinct yet thrilling experiences. The A6 e-tron Avant captivates with its elegant design and industry-leading aerodynamics, making it a perfect choice for those seeking a sophisticated yet …
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
VS
In the battle of electric sophistication, the Audi Q4 e-tron stands out with its compact SUV design, offering practicality and a versatile interior for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant brings a stylish edge to the performance segment, combining sleek aesthetics with impressive …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant and the VW ID.7 Touring are two electric estate cars aimed at buyers who want long-range practicality with the feel of a traditional wagon, but they take different approaches to luxury, technology and driving character. The Audi leans on premium materials, sharper dynamics …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant and BMW iX3 are premium electric options aimed at buyers who want luxury, practicality and modern EV technology — the A6 e-tron Avant pairs a sleek Avant (estate) design with Audi’s new electric architecture, while the iX3 delivers a more conventional SUV form with BMW’s …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Lexus RX
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the battle of luxury and practicality, the Lexus RX and Mazda CX-80 present distinct offerings that cater to different driver preferences. The RX impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, delivering a smooth ride that epitomizes luxury. Meanwhile, the CX-80 combines stylish …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
55,200 - 100,100 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 17 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
539 - 716 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,185 - 2,410 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
502 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
4,928 mm
Length
-
Width
1,923 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
1,504 - 1,527 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,422 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
470 - 500 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
326 - 551 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
435 - 855 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
240 - 405 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Audi A6 e-tron Avant have?

The Audi A6 e-tron Avant is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.