VS

Audi A6 e-tron Avant vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (551 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (55,200 £ vs 58,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 e-tron Avant or Volvo XC60?

Audi A6 e-tron Avant vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Audi A6 e-tron Avant

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Volvo XC60

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A6 e-tron Avant

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Audi A6 e-tron Avant is marginally cheaper – starting at 55,200 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,035 £.

As for electric range, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers significantly more range – reaching up to 716 km, about 637 km more than the Volvo XC60.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers clearly more power – delivering 551 HP compared to 406 HP. That’s roughly 145 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Volvo XC60 takes 4.9 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A6 e-tron Avant delivers visibly more torque with 855 Nm compared to 669 Nm. That’s about 186 Nm more.

A6 e-tron Avant

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo XC60 is barely lighter – 2,150 kg compared to 2,185 kg. The difference is around 35 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries very slightly more – 510 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A6 e-tron Avant stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £55,200
A6 e-tron Avant

Audi A6 e-tron Avant

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 326 - 551 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 17 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 539 - 716 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Comparing the Volvo XC60 and the Volvo EX60 pits a familiar midsize premium SUV against Volvo’s new all-electric contender: the XC60 offers refined petrol and hybrid options while the EX60 focuses on pure-electric range, sharper tech and lower running costs. If you’re choosing between established …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi A6 e-tron Avant

The Audi A6 e-tron Avant wraps Audi's trademark refinement into a sleek electric estate that looks at home in the city or on the open road. Inside it's grown-up and tech-forward with practical packaging for family life, delivering a composed, confident drive that makes everyday hauling feel a bit more special and slightly futuristic.

details
A243176_medium
A243167_medium
A243148_medium

Reviews Audi A6 e-tron Avant

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
Jakub
2 Jul 2026, 06:56:49

I own an XC60 2.4 D3 and I'm delighted. I suspect that later generations of the car are only better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant and the Audi Q6 e-tron bring electric power to two distinct Audi philosophies: the Avant offers a low, aerodynamic touring wagon focused on efficiency and luggage capacity, while the Q6 e-tron is a higher-riding SUV that emphasizes space, visibility and everyday …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant and the VW ID.7 Touring are two electric estate cars aimed at buyers who want long-range practicality with the feel of a traditional wagon, but they take different approaches to luxury, technology and driving character. The Audi leans on premium materials, sharper dynamics …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC60 and the VW Tayron are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want a blend of style, practicality and advanced tech, but they offer distinctly different personalities. The XC60 leans toward Scandinavian refinement, safety and a comfortable ride, while the VW Tayron delivers a more …
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 are two leading compact SUVs that serve similar needs but with distinct priorities: the RAV4 emphasizes value, reliability and fuel efficiency, while the XC60 leans toward premium comfort, advanced safety tech and a more refined driving experience. Choosing between …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 comes down to practical reliability and value versus premium comfort and advanced safety tech. The CR-V is a roomy, efficient family SUV with low running costs, while the XC60 focuses on a refined interior, stronger safety credentials and a more …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
55,200 - 100,100 £
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 17 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
539 - 716 km
Electric Range
79 km
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
59 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,185 - 2,410 kg
Curb weight
2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
502 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,928 mm
Length
-
Width
1,923 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
1,504 - 1,527 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,422 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
470 - 500 kg
Payload
510 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
326 - 551 HP
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
435 - 855 Nm
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
240 - 405 kW
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the Audi A6 e-tron Avant have?

The Audi A6 e-tron Avant is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.