VS

Audi e-tron GT vs Volvo XC40 comparison

Compare performance (843 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (93,300 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi e-tron GT or Volvo XC40?

Audi e-tron GT vs Volvo XC40: Key differences

Audi e-tron GT

  • considerably more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h

Volvo XC40

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
  • a bit more trunk space

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

e-tron GT

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Volvo XC40 is significantly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Audi e-tron GT costs 93,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 56,580 £.

XC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi e-tron GT offers considerably more power – delivering 843 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 646 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi e-tron GT is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 2.9 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 4.7 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Audi e-tron GT is markedly faster – reaching 250 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 70 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi e-tron GT delivers substantially more torque with 1,027 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 727 Nm more.

e-tron GT

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Volvo XC40 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo XC40 is clearly lighter – 1,688 kg compared to 2,355 kg. The difference is around 667 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers a bit more boot space – 452 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 47 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC40 carries barely more – 532 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 47 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi e-tron GT is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £93,300
e-tron GT

Audi e-tron GT

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 503 - 843 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.9 - 19 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 582 - 617 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Audi e-tron GT
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi e-tron GT

The Audi e-tron GT is a striking electric grand tourer that blends dramatic, low-slung styling with the hushed refinement of a luxury saloon. Behind the beautiful skin you'll find a driver-focused cabin and brisk, silent performance that makes daily commutes feel like auditioning for a weekend road trip — and yes, it manages to be both serious and a little bit smug about it.

details
A210772_overfull
A210761_overfull
A210763_overfull
A210762_overfull
A210735_overfull
A211416_overfull
A211417_overfull
A211462_overfull

Reviews Audi e-tron GT

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo XC40

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (4 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
Peugeot 3008
Volvo XC40
VS
The Peugeot 3008 is the extrovert of the pair—bold styling, a quirky, techy interior and strong value that make it a fun crossover to live with, while the Volvo XC40 plays the long game with understated Scandinavian style, class-leading safety and a more premium feel. Pick the 3008 if you want …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Hyundai Tucson
Volvo XC40
VS
The Hyundai Tucson turns heads with bold styling, generous kit and wallet-friendly practicality, while the Volvo XC40 answers with crisp Scandinavian design, a cosseting cabin and a premium badge that justifies the extra euros. If you want bang-for-buck family usability and lots of equipment go …
Lexus LBX
Volvo XC40
VS
The Lexus LBX is a chic, compact premium crossover that trades the XC40's boxy utility for Japanese finesse — quieter, more refined and aimed at city buyers who value style and efficiency. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a more rugged, practical choice with more interior space, stronger safety tech …
CUPRA Formentor
Volvo XC40
VS
The CUPRA Formentor is a punchy, coupe-styled compact SUV whose sharp chassis and spicy engines deliver grin-inducing drive and looks that demand attention; the Volvo XC40 answers with calm Scandinavian poise, clever practicality and safety tech that makes daily life feel worry-free. If you crave …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
The Honda CR‑V is the sensible family SUV — cavernous boot, comfortable ride and rock‑solid reliability that keeps running costs down, while the Volvo XC40 tempts you with Scandi styling, cutting‑edge safety tech and a more premium, tactile cabin. Choose the CR‑V for everyday practicality and …
Lexus NX
Volvo XC40
VS
The Lexus NX and Volvo XC40 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Audi e-tron GT
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
93,300 - 137,600 £
Price
36,800 - 47,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.9 - 19 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
582 - 617 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
97 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,355 - 2,395 kg
Curb weight
1,688 kg
Trunk capacity
350 - 405 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4,997 - 5,004 mm
Length
4,425 mm
Width
1,964 mm
Width
1,863 mm
Height
1,379 - 1,394 mm
Height
1,652 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,328 L
Payload
455 - 485 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
503 - 843 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.9 - 4.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
245 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
625 - 1,027 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
370 - 620 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Volvo
Is the Audi e-tron GT offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi e-tron GT is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.