Compare performance (300 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (24,900 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q2 or Toyota C-HR?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The compact SUV segment has witnessed a surge in popularity, with automakers racing to innovate and capture the attention of urban explorers and families alike. Amongst the top contenders in this realm are the Audi Q2 and the Toyota C-HR. Let’s delve deeper into their technical aspects, innovations, and unique selling points.
Both the Audi Q2 and the Toyota C-HR deliver distinct performance profiles tailored to different driving preferences. The Audi Q2 is versatile in its engine offerings, including petrol and diesel variants with power outputs ranging from 116 HP to a robust 300 HP. These engines are paired with manual or dual-clutch automatic transmissions, providing drivers with a choice between front-wheel and all-wheel drive systems. With such variety, the Q2 can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in as fast as 4.9 seconds, meeting the needs of those who crave speed.
In contrast, the Toyota C-HR is skewed towards efficiency and sustainability, boasting a full hybrid or plug-in hybrid engine. Its power outputs vary between 140 HP and an impressive 223 HP, aimed at delivering a balance between power and economy. The hybrid engines are coupled with a CVT transmission, focusing on smooth and fuel-efficient drives. Impressively, the C-HR can cover up to 68 km on electric power alone, showcasing Toyota’s commitment to reducing carbon footprints.
Fuel efficiency is a defining feature of both models but approached differently. The Audi Q2’s fuel consumption varies from 4.8 to 8.4 L/100 km depending on the engine choice. Despite its higher performance options, it remains a viable choice for those mindful of fuel costs. However, its CO2 efficiency class spans from D to G, indicating a broader range of environmental impacts based on engine selection.
The Toyota C-HR triumphs in environmental efficiency, with consumption rates as low as 0.8 L/100 km for its plug-in hybrid variant. Its CO2 emissions are impressively low, ranging from 17 to 115 g/km, placing it in the B to C efficiency classes, which aligns with eco-friendly transportation trends.
Audi and Toyota have crafted designs that appeal to modern sensibilities. The Audi Q2 showcases a compact form with dimensions of 4208 mm in length and a width of 1794 mm, offering a trunk capacity up to 405 liters. Meanwhile, the Toyota C-HR stands slightly longer and wider at 4362 mm and 1832 mm respectively but cleverly maximizes its interior space with a trunk capacity up to 447 liters.
Both models seat five and are equipped with five doors, with their designs reflecting the brands’ philosophies. The Q2's sharp lines and distinctive Audi grille exude sophistication and sportiness, while the C-HR’s bold curves and futuristic stance capture Toyota’s avant-garde approach.
When choosing between the Audi Q2 and the Toyota C-HR, potential buyers must consider what matters most in their vehicular lifestyle. The Audi Q2 offers diversity in performance and luxury features, appealing to drivers who seek a compact SUV with a spirited edge and premium feel. On the other hand, the Toyota C-HR represents efficiency and eco-conscious driving without compromising on style or modern features.
Ultimately, both the Audi Q2 and Toyota C-HR bring innovative technologies and high standards to the compact SUV market, catering to a broad spectrum of driver preferences. Whether it's the allure of German engineering or the sustainability-forward Japanese technology, these models stand out as exemplary choices in their category.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Audi Q2 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 24,900 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,277 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Audi Q2 with 4.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q2 offers noticeably more power – delivering 300 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 77 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q2 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Toyota C-HR takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi Q2 is slightly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,505 kg. The difference is around 175 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Toyota C-HR offers barely more boot space – 447 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q2 carries a bit more – 510 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.
The Toyota C-HR holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q2 packs Audi’s premium attitude into a compact, cheeky package that turns city streets into a runway for tasteful design and clever practicality. It’s an easy car to live with thanks to an upscale cabin, composed manners and sprightly handling, and while it won’t satisfy someone chasing sports-car thrills, it’s a smart, stylish pick for buyers who want substance with a wink.
details
The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,900 - 43,600 £
|
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
66 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
127 - 183 g/km
|
co2
52 - 116 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,610 kg
|
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
355 - 405 L
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,794 - 1,802 mm
|
Width
1,832 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
450 - 510 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 300 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España