Compare performance (158 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (21,100 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Captur or Toyota C-HR?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The compact SUV segment is bustling with options, but two models have consistently caught the attention of consumers and critics alike: the Renault Captur and the Toyota C-HR. Both offer unique features, innovative technologies, and stylish designs, but which one stands out in terms of technical specifications and driving experience? Let’s delve into a detailed comparison of these two popular vehicles.
The Renault Captur presents a modern and effortlessly stylish exterior with a length of 4239 mm and a width of 1797 mm. Its bold lines and dynamic stance give it a youthful appeal. In contrast, the Toyota C-HR is slightly larger at 4362 mm long and 1832 mm wide, showcasing a more aggressive design language with sharp angles and strong character lines. Both vehicles maintain a compact SUV profile, making them well-suited for urban driving and parking.
Turning to performance, the Renault Captur offers a range of engine options, including Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, LPG, and traditional Petrol variants. The power output ranges from 91 HP to 158 HP, with the hybrid variants providing impressive fuel efficiencies of around 4.7 to 6.2 L/100 km. Captur drivers can select from a variety of transmissions, including automatic and manual options, granting flexibility to suit personal driving preferences.
On the other hand, the Toyota C-HR excels with its hybrid offerings, featuring both Full Hybrid and Plugin Hybrid options that provide an outstanding balance of performance and ecology. The C-HR's power output varies, reaching up to 223 HP in the Plugin variant. Fuel consumption is stellar, with as low as 0.8 L/100 km for the hybrid model, making it one of the most fuel-efficient options in its class. The C-HR is equipped with a CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission) that enhances driving smoothness and efficiency.
Both vehicles offer a front-wheel-drive configuration, but the Toyota C-HR takes the lead with an optional all-wheel-drive system, providing enhanced stability and traction under various driving conditions. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h is quite impressive, with both models reaching this mark in approximately 9.9 seconds. However, the C-HR's quicker variants achieve this in 7.4 seconds, showcasing its sporty credentials.
Inside, both the Captur and C-HR prioritize comfort and technology. The Captur supports 5 passengers, boasting trunk capacities that range between 326 L to 422 L, providing ample space for everyday use. The C-HR also accommodates 5 passengers, but offers a more generous trunk space with options up to 447 L, making it a slight winner in utility.
Technology-wise, the Renault Captur comes equipped with a comprehensive infotainment system, featuring smartphone connectivity and driver-assist technologies. The Toyota C-HR equally impresses with its intuitive infotainment interface and advanced driver-assist features, including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, enhancing safety and convenience.
In terms of emissions, both models perform well within their classes. The Renault Captur boasts CO2 emissions ranging from 106 g/km to 139 g/km, while the Toyota C-HR's efficient hybrid powertrains achieve as low as 17 g/km, making it an eco-friendlier option. This efficiency can be particularly appealing to environmentally conscious drivers.
Choosing between the Renault Captur and the Toyota C-HR ultimately depends on individual priorities. The Captur excels in aesthetic appeal and a wider range of engine options, catering to diverse consumer needs. Meanwhile, the C-HR offers unparalleled fuel efficiency and cutting-edge hybrid technology, appealing to those who prioritize sustainability and advanced driving dynamics.
Whichever model you choose, both the Renault Captur and Toyota C-HR embody the charm and capability characteristic of today’s compact SUVs, delivering enjoyable driving experiences and innovative features for the modern driver.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Captur is visibly cheaper – starting at 21,100 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,006 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Renault Captur with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers markedly more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 65 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.9 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Captur is slightly lighter – 1,323 kg compared to 1,505 kg. The difference is around 182 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Toyota C-HR offers marginally more boot space – 447 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Captur carries only slightly more – 453 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.
The Toyota C-HR is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Captur is a cheeky little crossover that pairs city-friendly agility with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and enough style to turn heads at the lights. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want practical versatility and a dash of personality on their daily drives, without taking itself too seriously.
details
The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,100 - 28,400 £
|
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
66 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
co2
52 - 116 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
|
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
|
Length
4,239 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,832 mm
|
|
Height
1,575 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,363 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España