Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q3 vs Mazda CX-60 comparison
Compare performance (272 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Mazda CX-60?
Q3
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Audi Q3 is slightly cheaper – starting at 38,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,443 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi Q3 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 119 km, about 56 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
CX-60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers slightly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers visibly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
Q3
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is moderately lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 255 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers moderately more boot space – 570 L compared to 488 L. That’s a difference of about 82 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries moderately more – 612 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 77 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £38,200
Audi Q3
Audi Q3
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q3
The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.
details
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Audi Q3
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.