@ Audi AG
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Audi Q3 vs Mazda CX-60 – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Two cars, one duel: Audi Q3 meets Mazda CX-60.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3 @ Audi AG

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Audi Q3 has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38200 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 3677 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Audi Q3 with 1.70 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Audi Q3 performs decisively better – achieving up to 119 km, about 55 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a to a small extent edge – offering 327 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.70 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi Q3 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Mazda CX-60 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 21 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm difference.

Q3 @ Audi AG

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Audi Q3 is to a small extent lighter – 1635 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 255 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers a bit more room – 570 L compared to 488 L. That’s a difference of about 82 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs somewhat better – up to 1726 L, which is about 340 L more than the Audi Q3.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 a bit takes the win – 612 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 77 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-60 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £41,900
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.4 - 5.4 L
  • Electric Range : 64 km

Audi Q3

5 (1)
rate

The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.

details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
Audi Q3
Mazda CX-60
Q3 @ Audi AG
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption

Price
38200 - 52900 £
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Electric Range
64 km
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
39 - 195 g/km
co2
31 - 139 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 60 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1635 - 1900 kg
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
4531 mm
Length
4745 mm
Width
1859 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1559 - 1601 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Max trunk capacity
1196 - 1386 L
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
208 - 240 km/h
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
Is the Audi Q3 offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.