VS

Audi Q3 vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Mazda CX-80?

Audi Q3 vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Audi Q3

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi Q3 is clearly cheaper – starting at 38,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,100 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q3 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 119 km, about 59 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers somewhat more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers markedly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

Q3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is noticeably lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 496 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q3 offers substantially more boot space – 488 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 230 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries moderately more – 650 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 115 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q3 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,200
Q3

Audi Q3

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 118 - 119 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you value Audi’s upmarket feel and refinement or the T‑Roc’s sharper pricing and practical versatility. This comparison focuses on real-world driving, interior quality, technology and running costs to help you decide which compact …
Audi Q3
Kia Sportage
VS
Comparing the Audi Q3 and the Kia Sportage helps buyers choose between a compact premium SUV that prioritizes refinement and tech, and a mainstream compact that focuses on space, value and practicality. The Q3 impresses with upscale materials, sharper handling and a quieter cabin, while the …
Audi Q3
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 is a compact premium crossover that blends sharp styling with a well-crafted interior, making it an appealing choice for urban drivers who want a touch of luxury. It delivers a composed ride, intuitive tech features and a practical cabin, so it works well as a comfortable daily driver with an upscale feel.

details
A188605_overfull
A188610_overfull
A188613_overfull
A1814467_overfull
A188626_overfull

Reviews Audi Q3

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
Del
16 Jun 2026, 12:27:22

Very comfortable and very enjoyable to drive, interior very pleasant. Only missing the automatic controls.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
dd
2 Nov 2025, 22:05:04

Very comfortable. Precise steering. E35 petrol engine, 150 hp — sufficient. Manual gearbox very good and well-geared. Looks very handsome. Very large boot. Premium interior.

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Audi Q3
SEAT Ateca
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 stands out with its refined interior and advanced technology features, offering a luxurious driving experience. In contrast, the SEAT Ateca impresses with its sporty design and excellent value, making it a practical choice for those seeking both …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Audi Q3
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Audi Q3 dresses up compact-SUV practicality in premium polish — plush interior, refined ride and tech that whispers “grown-up” refinement. The CUPRA Terramar, by contrast, prowls with sharper handling, punchier engines and a sporty attitude that’ll make you smile even if the mpg takes a hit, so …
Audi Q3
Lexus NX
VS
Audi Q3 and Lexus NX go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi Q3 or the Lexus NX is the …
Audi Q3
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and VW Tayron deliver a blend of style and performance that appeals to a diverse range of buyers. While the Q3 boasts Audi's signature luxury and advanced technology, the Tayron offers practicality and value without sacrificing modern features. …
Lexus RX
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the battle of luxury and practicality, the Lexus RX and Mazda CX-80 present distinct offerings that cater to different driver preferences. The RX impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, delivering a smooth ride that epitomizes luxury. Meanwhile, the CX-80 combines stylish …
Audi Q3
Ford Kuga
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced tech features, appealing to those who prioritize comfort and sophistication. On the other hand, the Ford Kuga offers a more practical and budget-friendly option, boasting versatility and ample …
Audi Q3
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
39 - 195 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q3 have?

The Audi Q3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.