Is the Audi Q3 offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Audi Q3 deliver on the road?

Depending on the version, the Audi Q3 delivers up to 272 HP.

What is the fuel consumption of the Audi Q3 according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Audi Q3 consumes 1.70 L.

How far can the Audi Q3 go on a full charge?

The WLTP range is up to 119 km.

What is the battery capacity of the Audi Q3?

The battery capacity is 19.70 kWh.

How fast can the Audi Q3 go?

The Audi Q3 reaches up to 240 km/h.

How many liters of cargo space does the Audi Q3 offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 488 L fit inside.

How big is the Audi Q3 overall?

Length 4531 mm, width 1859 mm, height 1601 mm – those are the dimensions of the Audi Q3.

What drivetrain options does the Suzuki Swift have?

The Suzuki Swift is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Suzuki Swift deliver on the road?

Up to 82 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the Suzuki Swift in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 4.40 L.

What maximum speed does the Suzuki Swift reach?

Depending on the model, top speed is 170 km/h.

How big is the Suzuki Swift overall?

Overall, the Suzuki Swift is 3860 mm long, 1735 mm wide and 1485 mm high.

Audi Q3 vs Suzuki Swift - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3 @ Audi AG

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki Swift has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 17100 £, while the Audi Q3 costs 38200 £. That’s a price difference of around 21086 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi Q3 manages with 1.70 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Suzuki Swift with 4.40 L. The difference is about 2.70 L per 100 km.

Swift @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 has a significantly edge – offering 272 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 190 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the Audi Q3 performs distinct better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Suzuki Swift tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 70 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q3 pulls significantly stronger with 400 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 288 Nm difference.

Q3 @ Audi AG

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Suzuki Swift is decisively lighter – 1069 kg compared to 1635 kg. The difference is around 566 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Audi Q3 offers significantly more room – 488 L compared to 265 L. That’s a difference of about 223 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Audi Q3 performs evident better – up to 1386 L, which is about 406 L more than the Suzuki Swift.

When it comes to payload, Audi Q3 convincingly takes the win – 535 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 239 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Audi Q3 shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Suzuki Swift

Top Car Comparisons

@ Audi AG

Audi Q3

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW T-Roc

VS

The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …

@ Hyundai Motor Company

Hyundai i10

@ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Suzuki Swift

VS

The Hyundai i10 is the sensible city slicker — compact, surprisingly roomy for its size, cheap to run and designed to make parking a confidence exercise rather than a stressful workout. The Suzuki Swift is the cheeky, slightly sportier option with sharper handling and bolder looks, so pick it if …

Costs and Consumption
Price 38200 - 52900 £	Price 17100 - 21200 £
Consumption L/100km 1.7 - 8.6 L	Consumption L/100km 4.4 - 4.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 118 - 119 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 19.70 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 39 - 195 g/km	co2 98 - 110 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 45 - 60 L	Fuel tank capacity 37 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type Hatchback
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1635 - 1900 kg	Curb weight 1069 - 1145 kg
Trunk capacity 375 - 488 L	Trunk capacity 265 L
Length 4531 mm	Length 3860 mm
Width 1859 mm	Width 1735 mm
Height 1559 - 1601 mm	Height 1485 - 1510 mm
Max trunk capacity 1196 - 1386 L	Max trunk capacity 980 L
Payload 505 - 535 kg	Payload 282 - 296 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 150 - 272 HP	Power HP 82 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.7 - 9.2 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h -
Max Speed 208 - 240 km/h	Max Speed 160 - 170 km/h
Torque 250 - 400 Nm	Torque 112 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 3
Power kW 110 - 200 kW	Power kW 61 kW
Engine capacity 1498 - 1984 cm3	Engine capacity 1197 cm3