@ Audi AG
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Audi Q3 vs Volvo XC60 – Which car suits you better?

Two cars, one duel: Audi Q3 meets Volvo XC60.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Q3 @ Audi AG

The Battle of Compact Luxury SUVs: Audi Q3 vs. Volvo XC60

In today’s automotive market, compact luxury SUVs are coveted for their perfect balance of style, comfort, and performance. Two prominent contenders in this category are the Audi Q3 and the Volvo XC60. Both models, updated for 2024, bring their own blend of technology and innovation to the table. Let’s delve into the specifics to find out which one better suits your driving preferences.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Performance and Engine Options

The Audi Q3 comes with a versatile range of engine options, including both petrol and diesel variants. Buyers can choose from power outputs ranging from 150 to 245 HP, with torque spanning 250 to 370 Nm. The Q3 can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in 5.8 to 9.5 seconds, depending on the engine configuration. Its maximum speed peaks at 237 km/h. With a transmission choice between a manual gearbox and a dual-clutch automatic, drivers have the option of a more personalized driving experience.

On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 provides a contemporary edge with its petrol mild hybrid and plug-in hybrid options. The power range is slightly higher, stretching from 250 to 455 HP, and torque ranges from 350 to 709 Nm. Impressively, the XC60 can sprint from 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds. It features an all-wheel-drive system paired exclusively with an automatic gearbox, ensuring a smooth ride, whether you’re dealing with city commutes or country roads.

Q3 @ Audi AG

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

When it comes to fuel consumption, the Audi Q3 varies from 5.5 to 8.5 L/100 km, reflecting the diversity of its powertrain options. CO2 emissions range between 143 and 193 g/km, which falls within the E to G efficiency classes.

In contrast, the Volvo XC60 offers a significant advantage with its Plug-In Hybrid variant, boasting a consumption rate of just 0.9 L/100 km combined with an electric range of up to 80 km. CO2 emissions are notably low, at 22 g/km for the plug-in model, falling in the B efficiency class, making it an eco-conscious choice.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Interior Comfort and Space

Both SUVs provide spacious interiors with seating for five and host a plethora of luxury features. The Audi Q3 offers a trunk capacity of 530 liters, accommodating 475 to 495 kg of payload, depending on the configuration. It maintains a sleek profile with a length of roughly 4,500 mm, width of 1,843 mm, and height of 1,567 mm.

The Volvo XC60, meanwhile, offers a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 468 to 483 liters but compensates with a larger payload capacity of 510 to 550 kg. Its dimensions extend to a length of 4,688 mm, a width of 1,902 mm, and a height of 1,658 mm, demonstrating a more robust presence on the road.

Q3 @ Audi AG

Technological Innovations

The 2024 Audi Q3 integrates the latest in infotainment and driver assistance systems, featuring a sophisticated Virtual Cockpit and an array of safety features including lane assist and adaptive cruise control.

Volvo, known for its safety innovations, packs the XC60 with state-of-the-art tech, including a user-friendly touchscreen interface and advanced safety systems such as pilot assist and collision avoidance technology.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Conclusion

Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the Volvo XC60 boils down to personal preferences and priorities. The Audi Q3 stands out with a broader range of powertrain choices, offering a combination of traditional driving feel and modern efficiency. Conversely, the Volvo XC60 sets itself apart with superior fuel efficiency, particularly in its plug-in hybrid variant, along with advanced safety features.

Both vehicles deliver on luxury and performance, ensuring that prospective buyers will enjoy their ride regardless of the choice. As always, a test drive of both models is recommended to truly experience their unique qualities firsthand.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3 @ Audi AG

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Audi Q3 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38200 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 10963 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi Q3 manages with 1.70 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Volvo XC60 with 2.80 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Audi Q3 performs noticeable better – achieving up to 119 km, about 37 km more than the Volvo XC60.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a convincingly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 183 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Audi Q3 takes 5.70 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi Q3 performs evident better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls clearly stronger with 709 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 309 Nm difference.

Q3 @ Audi AG

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Audi Q3 is slightly lighter – 1635 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 265 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Audi Q3 offers barely noticeable more room – 488 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 5 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 performs slightly better – up to 1543 L, which is about 157 L more than the Audi Q3.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 hardly perceptible takes the win – 550 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Audi Q3 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi Q3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £38,200
Q3 @ Audi AG

Audi Q3

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.7 - 8.6 L
  • Electric Range : 118 - 119 km
details

Audi Q3

5 (1)
rate

The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.

details
A188605_overfull @ Audi AG
A188610_overfull @ Audi AG
A188613_overfull @ Audi AG
A1814467_overfull @ Audi AG
A188626_overfull @ Audi AG

Volvo XC60

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ Volvo Cars
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ Volvo Cars
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ Volvo Cars
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior @ Volvo Cars
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior @ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Audi AG
Audi Q3
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q3
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and CUPRA Terramar stand out with their distinct design and performance characteristics. The Q3 impresses with its polished interior and advanced technology, making it a solid choice for those who prioritize luxury and comfort. Meanwhile, the …
Audi Q3
Volvo XC60
Q3 @ Audi AG
XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
38200 - 52900 £
Price
49200 - 75100 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
co2
39 - 195 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 60 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1635 - 1900 kg
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
4531 mm
Length
4708 mm
Width
1859 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
1559 - 1601 mm
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
Max trunk capacity
1196 - 1386 L
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
208 - 240 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design and a strong emphasis on safety features, making it a top choice for families and safety-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, appealing …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the highly competitive midsize SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Volvo XC60 stand out for their distinctive approaches to style and performance. While the Kuga excels with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the XC60 offers a luxurious cabin and a refined driving experience. …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo V60
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the ongoing battle of luxury and practicality, the Volvo V60 and Volvo XC60 stand as captivating contenders. The V60, a sleek station wagon, offers a refined driving experience with impressive fuel efficiency and an interior designed for comfort. In contrast, the XC60, a compact SUV, boasts a …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the head-to-head comparison of the Volvo XC60 and Lynk & Co 08, both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table. The Volvo XC60 stands out with its time-tested reputation for safety and luxury, offering a refined driving experience and robust build quality. On the other hand, the Lynk & Co 08, …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q3
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and VW Tayron deliver a blend of style and performance that appeals to a diverse range of buyers. While the Q3 boasts Audi's signature luxury and advanced technology, the Tayron offers practicality and value without sacrificing modern features. …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 each bring their unique strengths to the table. The RAV4 excels with its reliability and spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for families who prioritize practicality. In contrast, the XC60 offers a luxurious …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q3
@ BMW Group Press
BMW X1
VS
In the increasingly competitive compact luxury SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and BMW X1 stand out for their distinct driving experiences and premium features. The Q3 impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, offering a smooth ride and a user-friendly infotainment system. Meanwhile, …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q3
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Audi Q3 and CUPRA Formentor stand out with their distinct personalities and performance characteristics. The Q3 offers a refined interior and a smooth ride, making it an ideal choice for those prioritizing comfort and luxury. On the other hand, the CUPRA …
Is the Audi Q3 offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.