Compare performance (272 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 58,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Volvo XC60?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In today’s automotive market, compact luxury SUVs are coveted for their perfect balance of style, comfort, and performance. Two prominent contenders in this category are the Audi Q3 and the Volvo XC60. Both models, updated for 2024, bring their own blend of technology and innovation to the table. Let’s delve into the specifics to find out which one better suits your driving preferences.
The Audi Q3 comes with a versatile range of engine options, including both petrol and diesel variants. Buyers can choose from power outputs ranging from 150 to 245 HP, with torque spanning 250 to 370 Nm. The Q3 can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in 5.8 to 9.5 seconds, depending on the engine configuration. Its maximum speed peaks at 237 km/h. With a transmission choice between a manual gearbox and a dual-clutch automatic, drivers have the option of a more personalized driving experience.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 provides a contemporary edge with its petrol mild hybrid and plug-in hybrid options. The power range is slightly higher, stretching from 250 to 455 HP, and torque ranges from 350 to 709 Nm. Impressively, the XC60 can sprint from 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds. It features an all-wheel-drive system paired exclusively with an automatic gearbox, ensuring a smooth ride, whether you’re dealing with city commutes or country roads.
When it comes to fuel consumption, the Audi Q3 varies from 5.5 to 8.5 L/100 km, reflecting the diversity of its powertrain options. CO2 emissions range between 143 and 193 g/km, which falls within the E to G efficiency classes.
In contrast, the Volvo XC60 offers a significant advantage with its Plug-In Hybrid variant, boasting a consumption rate of just 0.9 L/100 km combined with an electric range of up to 80 km. CO2 emissions are notably low, at 22 g/km for the plug-in model, falling in the B efficiency class, making it an eco-conscious choice.
Both SUVs provide spacious interiors with seating for five and host a plethora of luxury features. The Audi Q3 offers a trunk capacity of 530 liters, accommodating 475 to 495 kg of payload, depending on the configuration. It maintains a sleek profile with a length of roughly 4,500 mm, width of 1,843 mm, and height of 1,567 mm.
The Volvo XC60, meanwhile, offers a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 468 to 483 liters but compensates with a larger payload capacity of 510 to 550 kg. Its dimensions extend to a length of 4,688 mm, a width of 1,902 mm, and a height of 1,658 mm, demonstrating a more robust presence on the road.
The 2024 Audi Q3 integrates the latest in infotainment and driver assistance systems, featuring a sophisticated Virtual Cockpit and an array of safety features including lane assist and adaptive cruise control.
Volvo, known for its safety innovations, packs the XC60 with state-of-the-art tech, including a user-friendly touchscreen interface and advanced safety systems such as pilot assist and collision avoidance technology.
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the Volvo XC60 boils down to personal preferences and priorities. The Audi Q3 stands out with a broader range of powertrain choices, offering a combination of traditional driving feel and modern efficiency. Conversely, the Volvo XC60 sets itself apart with superior fuel efficiency, particularly in its plug-in hybrid variant, along with advanced safety features.
Both vehicles deliver on luxury and performance, ensuring that prospective buyers will enjoy their ride regardless of the choice. As always, a test drive of both models is recommended to truly experience their unique qualities firsthand.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Audi Q3 is considerably cheaper – starting at 38,200 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,049 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 1.6 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Audi Q3 with 1.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi Q3 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 119 km, about 40 km more than the Volvo XC60.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers noticeably more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 134 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Audi Q3 takes 5.7 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers clearly more torque with 669 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 269 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is visibly lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 515 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q3 carries very slightly more – 535 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
The Audi Q3 leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q3 is a compact premium crossover that blends sharp styling with a well-crafted interior, making it an appealing choice for urban drivers who want a touch of luxury. It delivers a composed ride, intuitive tech features and a practical cabin, so it works well as a comfortable daily driver with an upscale feel.
details
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
|
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
79 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
co2
59 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
|
Curb weight
2,150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,902 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Payload
510 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España