Compare performance (272 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (38200 £ vs 49200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Volvo XC60?
In today’s automotive market, compact luxury SUVs are coveted for their perfect balance of style, comfort, and performance. Two prominent contenders in this category are the Audi Q3 and the Volvo XC60. Both models, updated for 2024, bring their own blend of technology and innovation to the table. Let’s delve into the specifics to find out which one better suits your driving preferences.
The Audi Q3 comes with a versatile range of engine options, including both petrol and diesel variants. Buyers can choose from power outputs ranging from 150 to 245 HP, with torque spanning 250 to 370 Nm. The Q3 can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in 5.8 to 9.5 seconds, depending on the engine configuration. Its maximum speed peaks at 237 km/h. With a transmission choice between a manual gearbox and a dual-clutch automatic, drivers have the option of a more personalized driving experience.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 provides a contemporary edge with its petrol mild hybrid and plug-in hybrid options. The power range is slightly higher, stretching from 250 to 455 HP, and torque ranges from 350 to 709 Nm. Impressively, the XC60 can sprint from 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds. It features an all-wheel-drive system paired exclusively with an automatic gearbox, ensuring a smooth ride, whether you’re dealing with city commutes or country roads.
When it comes to fuel consumption, the Audi Q3 varies from 5.5 to 8.5 L/100 km, reflecting the diversity of its powertrain options. CO2 emissions range between 143 and 193 g/km, which falls within the E to G efficiency classes.
In contrast, the Volvo XC60 offers a significant advantage with its Plug-In Hybrid variant, boasting a consumption rate of just 0.9 L/100 km combined with an electric range of up to 80 km. CO2 emissions are notably low, at 22 g/km for the plug-in model, falling in the B efficiency class, making it an eco-conscious choice.
Both SUVs provide spacious interiors with seating for five and host a plethora of luxury features. The Audi Q3 offers a trunk capacity of 530 liters, accommodating 475 to 495 kg of payload, depending on the configuration. It maintains a sleek profile with a length of roughly 4,500 mm, width of 1,843 mm, and height of 1,567 mm.
The Volvo XC60, meanwhile, offers a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 468 to 483 liters but compensates with a larger payload capacity of 510 to 550 kg. Its dimensions extend to a length of 4,688 mm, a width of 1,902 mm, and a height of 1,658 mm, demonstrating a more robust presence on the road.
The 2024 Audi Q3 integrates the latest in infotainment and driver assistance systems, featuring a sophisticated Virtual Cockpit and an array of safety features including lane assist and adaptive cruise control.
Volvo, known for its safety innovations, packs the XC60 with state-of-the-art tech, including a user-friendly touchscreen interface and advanced safety systems such as pilot assist and collision avoidance technology.
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the Volvo XC60 boils down to personal preferences and priorities. The Audi Q3 stands out with a broader range of powertrain choices, offering a combination of traditional driving feel and modern efficiency. Conversely, the Volvo XC60 sets itself apart with superior fuel efficiency, particularly in its plug-in hybrid variant, along with advanced safety features.
Both vehicles deliver on luxury and performance, ensuring that prospective buyers will enjoy their ride regardless of the choice. As always, a test drive of both models is recommended to truly experience their unique qualities firsthand.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Audi Q3 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38200 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10963 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi Q3 manages with 1.70 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Volvo XC60 with 2.80 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Audi Q3 performs noticeable better – achieving up to 119 km, about 37 km more than the Volvo XC60.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a convincingly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 183 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Audi Q3 takes 5.70 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls clearly stronger with 709 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 309 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Audi Q3 is slightly lighter – 1635 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 265 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Audi Q3 offers barely noticeable more room – 488 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 5 L.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 hardly perceptible takes the win – 550 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.
The Audi Q3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.
details
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38200 - 52900 £
|
Price
49200 - 75100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1635 - 1900 kg
|
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4708 mm
|
|
Width
1859 mm
|
Width
1902 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1655 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1543 L
|
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The Audi Q3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España